Legal Malpractice Lawsuit Against Kasowitz Benson Torres Can Wait, Court Rules
The plaintiff Steven Mariano claims attorneys from Kasowitz Benson Torres negligently drafted affirmative defenses and failed to advise of potential malpractice claims against international law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, which represented his company in a hedge fund transaction.
September 20, 2019 at 02:41 PM
3 minute read
A legal malpractice lawsuit against New York firm Kasowitz Benson Torres will remain in limbo until the case in which its accused of wrongdoing is resolved, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled.
Plaintiff Steven Mariano, who does business in South Florida, sued his former lawyers in Broward Circuit Court in 2017. He alleged the Kasowitz firm negligently drafted affirmative defenses that were stricken as legally insufficient in two cases in the Southern District of New York.
Mariano also claimed the firm failed to advise him about potential malpractice claims against international law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, which represented his company in an earlier hedge fund transaction—the catalyst to his legal trouble.
The dispute stems from Mariano's sale of shares in his company, Patriot National Inc., to a group of investors in 2015. Simpson Thacher represented him in that transaction, which spawned the New York litigation.
Investors claimed Patriot National breached its obligations by refusing to hand over 250,000 shares in exchange for $13.5 million. But Mariano's complaint alleged the investors used predatory tactics to manipulate the market and send his company into a "death spiral" to capitalize on the crash of its stock prices.
Simpson Thacher recommended the Kasowitz firm to Mariano, who claimed in his legal malpractice complaint that the litigation "decimated" his business.
The lawsuit also points the finger at Simpson Thacher, alleging the firm was negligent in drafting transactional documents and failed to properly warn Mariano's company about the risks of the deal.
Kasowitz attorneys Kenneth R. David, Michael Joseph Bowe, Anthony Macdonald Caputo Jr. and Hershey Stern worked on the New York cases, according to online case files. They did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Both firms have denied any wrongdoing. Both moved to stay the case, arguing the allegations were premature. Broward Circuit Judge John Bowman denied their petitions.
The Fourth DCA had a different take, though, ruling that the outcome of Kasowitz's case hinges on what happens with the claims against Simpson. If Simpson is found to have committed malpractice, for example, that would inform whether Mariano incurred damages by allegedly not being informed about viable claims against Kasowitz.
The order only applies to Kasowitz, which appealed the lower court's denial.
Simpson Thacher Bartlett's trial attorney Kelly Melchiondo of Stearns Weaver Miller in Miami and Kasowitz's Miami counsel Kelly Luther, Danielle Moriber and Giselle Manseur did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
Kasowitz labeled the complaint baseless in its motion to dismiss, which sought to litigate in New York. Simpson Thacher also moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
"At its core, plaintiff has claimed that Simpson Thacher should have negotiated a different agreement," the Simpson Thacher motion argues. "However, the complaint is devoid of any allegation that the parties with whom Simpson Thacher negotiated would have ever agreed to the language plaintiff now says should have been drafted."
Counsel to Mariano, William Scherer of Conrad & Scherer in Fort Lauderdale was unavailable before deadline.
|Read the opinion:
More appeals:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRogge Dunn Represents Florida Trucking Firm in Civil RICO Suit Against Worldwide Express
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 2'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 3Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 4A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
- 5Grabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250