The Department of Labor Issues Final Rule Regarding Overtime Updates
On Sept. 24, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule, which updates the earnings thresholds necessary to exempt executive, administrative and professional employees from the Fair Labor Standards Act's minimum wage and overtime pay requirements and allows employers to count a portion of certain bonuses or commissions toward meeting the salary level.
September 24, 2019 at 05:53 PM
5 minute read
On Sept. 24, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule, which updates the earnings thresholds necessary to exempt executive, administrative and professional employees from the Fair Labor Standards Act's minimum wage and overtime pay requirements and allows employers to count a portion of certain bonuses or commissions toward meeting the salary level. The final rule will be effective on Jan. 1, 2020.
The DOL is updating both the minimum weekly standard salary level and the total annual compensation requirement for "highly compensated employees" to more accurately reflect growth in wages and salaries. The new thresholds account for growth in employee earnings, since the currently enforced thresholds were set in 2004. The DOL believes that the update to the standard salary level will maintain the traditional purposes of the salary level test and will help employers more readily identify exempt employees. The DOL is also revising the special salary levels for employees in U.S. territories and the special base rate for employees in the motion picture producing industry.
In the final rule, the DOL is:
- Raising the "standard salary level" from the currently enforced level of $455 per week ($23,000 per year) to $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 per year for a full-year worker);
- Raising the total annual compensation requirement for "highly compensated employees" from the currently enforced level of $100,000 per year to $107,432 per year;
- Allowing employers to use nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) paid at least annually to satisfy up to 10% of the standard salary level, in recognition of evolving pay practices; and
- Revising the special salary level for workers in U.S. territories and the motion picture industry.
In 2014, the Obama administration tried to double the threshold to include workers earning up to $913 per week ($47,476 per year). This change created quite an uproar. In 2016, a final rule to change the overtime thresholds was enjoined by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on Nov. 22, 2016, and was subsequently invalidated by that court. As of Nov. 6, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held the appeal in abeyance pending further rulemaking regarding a revised salary threshold. As the 2016 final rule was invalidated, the DOL has consistently enforced the 2004 level throughout the last 15 years: $455 per week standard salary level and a $100,000 total annual compensation threshold for highly compensated employees.
The new thresholds account for growth in employee earnings since the thresholds were last updated in 2004. Nearly every person who commented on the department's 2017 request for information, participated at listening sessions in 2018 regarding the regulations, or commented on the notice of proposed rulemaking agreed that the thresholds needed to be updated for this reason. The DOL estimates that 1.3 million additional workers will be entitled to wage and overtime pay as a result of the increase to the standard salary level. The DOL also estimates that an additional 102,000 workers will be entitled to overtime pay as a result of the increase to the "highly compensated employees" compensation level. In the final rule, the DOL also permits employers to use nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments to satisfy up to 10% of the standard salary level. For employers to credit nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments toward a portion of the standard salary level test, they must make such payments on an annual or more frequent basis.
The DOL believes this change is necessary because, based on their experience, fixed earning thresholds become substantially less effective over time. Furthermore, lengthy delays between threshold updates necessitate disruptively large increases when overdue updates ultimately occur. Accordingly, in the final rule, the DOL reaffirms its intent to update the earnings thresholds more regularly in the future through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
It should also be noted that the FLSA provides minimum wage-and-hour standards but does not prevent Florida from establishing its own protective standards. If Florida were to establish a more protective standard than the new provisions of the FLSA, then the higher standard would apply.
Additional information about the final rule is available on the DOL website.
This final rule has been submitted to the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for publication and is currently pending placement on public inspection at the OFR and publication in the Federal Register. This version of the final rule may vary slightly from the published document if minor technical or formatting changes are made during the OFR review process. Only the version published in the Federal Register is the official final rule.
Taylor Greene is an associate with the Miami-based law firm Allen Norton & Blue, the statewide firm devoted exclusively to the practice of labor and employment Law. Contact him at [email protected].
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madicon, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250