American and LATAM Airlines Hit With Helms-Burton Lawsuit
The suit makes American Airlines the second U.S. company to be sued under the Helms-Burton Act. Carnival Cruise Lines was hit with the first such suit in May.
September 25, 2019 at 08:38 AM
4 minute read
|
American Airlines and LATAM Airlines, an airline based in Santiago, Chile, have been hit with a lawsuit filed under Title III of the 1996 Helms-Burton Act.
The litigation makes American Airlines the second U.S. company, after Carnival Cruise Lines, to be sued under the law, which allows Americans to sue companies doing business in Cuba that are allegedly profiting off of land expropriated after the 1959 Cuban revolution. The Helms-Burton Act was first passed in 1996 but every U.S. administration had suspended it until the Trump administration announced it would, for the first time, allow it to take effect.
The complaint was filed Wednesday by Coral Gables-based Rivero Mestre, a law firm that has filed a number of Helms-Burton lawsuits since the law took effect May 2.
Plaintiff Jose Ramon López Regueiro is the son of José López Vilaboy, who, according to the complaint, owned what is now the José Martí International Airport in Havana before it was expropriated by the Cuban government in 1959.
López Vilaboy bought the airport, then referred to as the Rancho Boyeros Airport, in 1952 from Pan American Airways, according to the complaint. He then modernized and improved it by extending the runway and building a new terminal building, the suit alleges.
American Airlines issued a statement in response to the lawsuit.
"American Airlines service to Cuba including José Martí International Airport in Havana is authorized by the U.S. government, including the Department of Transportation and the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control," the company said. "In addition, Title III specifically exempts lawful travel, which is what American provides. We'll review this lawsuit in detail and vigorously defend our service to Cuba."
LatAm Airlines could not be reached for comment.
Rivero Mestre will be holding a press conference on the litigation around noon Wednesday.
American Airlines runs flights from José Martí to several U.S. cities, including Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Houston and Los Angeles. LATAM Airlines provides flights from Havana to a few Latin America countries, including Peru and Chile.
Because of the lack of precedent in Helms-Burton proceedings, it's unclear how the suit will fare in court. So-called blocking statutes — laws passed in several countries that block Helms-Burton actions — make collecting outside of the U.S. near-impossible. While American Airlines is a U.S. company, it is unclear what U.S. assets can be collected from LATAM Airlines.
Despite the unchartered legal territory, an August ruling in a separate Helms-Burton case involving Carnival Cruise Lines signaled that these suits won't easily go away. In that ruling, U.S. District Senior Judge James Lawrence King and U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom declined to toss two Helms-Burton lawsuits brought against the cruise line in the Southern District of Florida.
Carnival argued that because it was granted waivers by the U.S. government, its use of the ports are considered "lawful travel" — a claim the judges rejected.
"Based on the text and structure of Helms-Burton, the court holds that the lawful travel exception is an affirmative defense to trafficking that must be established by Carnival, not negated by plaintiff," King wrote.
The new complaint states that the plaintiff provided American and LATAM airlines 30-days notice before the suit was filed, making the two defendants liable to treble damages.
While the complaint does not specify damages or the property's value, plaintiff López Regueiro told French news agency AFP that his stake in the airport was worth $24 million at the time of confiscation.
Damages for Helms-Burton litigation are calculated by a formula: the greater of either fair market value of the property at the time of confiscation, plus interest, the current market value of the property or the "amount determined."
Because of this calculation, previous Helms-Burton suits have claimed damages of hundreds of millions of dollars. This is the case for one suit filed in July against French investment bank Société Générale S.A.
|Similar Stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250