Ex-Director Sues Over Losing Job at Transportation Commission
Teddi Pitts has filed a lawsuit alleging she was forced to resign in retaliation for exposing a $5.5 billion budget "irregularity" proposed by the Florida Department of Transportation.
September 25, 2019 at 01:16 PM
5 minute read
A former executive director of a state transportation commission has filed a lawsuit alleging she was forced to resign in retaliation for exposing a $5.5 billion budget "irregularity" proposed by the Florida Department of Transportation.
Teddi Pitts also accused the chairman of the Florida Transportation Commission of sexual harassment and gender discrimination in the lawsuit filed last week in Leon County circuit court.
Pitts resigned as executive director of the commission in January after working for the state for nearly 30 years, starting as a mail clerk at the FDOT and later holding staff positions in the Legislature.
While working for the commission, Pitts "identified and reported defendants' violations of one or more law [sic], rules, regulations and/or malfeasance, misfeasance, and/or gross misconduct, and thereafter was subject to retaliation by defendants," the lawsuit, filed by Tallahassee attorney Marie Mattox, alleges.
The lawsuit accuses commission members Ronald Howse and Jay Trumbull, as well as former FDOT Secretary Mike Dew and his chief of staff, Shannan Schuessler, of retaliating against Pitts and accuses Howse of sexual harassment.
When asked Tuesday to comment on the lawsuit, FDOT spokesman Tom Yu said the agency had not received the complaint, which names the commission and the department as defendants.
The lawsuit details a series of events dating back to December 2017, when Pitts flagged a $5.5 billion "significant irregularity" in the FDOT's $49 billion, five-year tentative work program. The transportation commission is set up in state law to provide oversight of the FDOT.
Pitts raised questions about reserve funds with transportation department staff members, who "failed to identify any statutory or other lawful authority for the reserve funds," the lawsuit said. On Dec. 18, 2017, Pitts also informed Trumbull, the transportation commission's chairman at the time, of the $5.5 billion "reserve irregularity" and "the wholly inadequate legal justification" provided by FDOT, according to the lawsuit.
Two days later, Trumbull told Pitts that then-Gov. Rick Scott's office "was displeased by her inquiry, and wanted the inquiry dropped immediately," the lawsuit said. Scott's staff also requested a performance review of Pitts.
After that, Pitts "was subject to systemic and pervasive hostile treatment, and a hostile work environment, as retaliation for her whistleblowing activity in questioning the reserve funds," the lawsuit alleges.
Howse, a commission member who now is the chairman of the panel, contacted Pitts and told her to start looking for another job, saying Dew "wanted her removed" and that her relationship with the transportation agency "was irredeemably broken," the lawsuit alleges. Howse also said that Pitts' assistant would be fired. The lawsuit alleges Howse had previously made discriminatory remarks about Pitts' assistant, regarding her race and disability.
Efforts to reach the Florida Transportation Commission on Tuesday were not successful. Howse did not respond to an email seeking a response to the lawsuit.
Pitts met with Schuessler on Jan. 17, 2018, to try and ascertain her "status, outlook and longevity" as the commission's executive director. Schuessler confirmed that Pitts lacked the support of the governor's office and the FDOT and "needed to find another job," the lawsuit says.
The same day, Pitts met with Dew and asked the transportation secretary if she would be fired, "to which Dew ominously replied, 'That very well could happen!'" according to the lawsuit.
Later in January, Pitts made a written complaint to Dew, outlining the reserve irregularity in the department's tentative work program, "Howse's inappropriate discriminatory remarks, and the retaliatory and hostile treatment … by Dew, Trumbull, Schuessler, Howse and others," the lawsuit alleges.
In April, Pitts was summoned to meet with Trumbull in Marianna, where he warned her "it would be 'her bloodbath'" if she did not resign before the commission's meeting later that month, according to the lawsuit.
The following month, Pitts filed whistleblower charges of discrimination with the Florida Commission on Human Relations, in which she complained of retaliatory conduct toward her, including "constant threats to terminate her employment, and the harassment and hostile work environment," the lawsuit says.
The retaliation against Pitts "was briefly less overt" following the filing of the whistleblower complaint but ramped up again after the November 2018 election results were final, according to the lawsuit.
Shortly after Gov. Ron DeSantis took office in January 2019, Howse, who was the new chairman of the transportation commission, demanded the resignation of Pitts and other commission staff members, prompting Pitts to file a second whistleblower complaint with the human rights commission.
The retaliation against Pitts didn't end when she lost her job, the lawsuit alleges. Pitts "sought numerous job opportunities for which she is well qualified." But, she alleged, although the application process generally proceeded well, she was "ultimately derailed by negative job references" from the defendants.
Pitts filed a third whistleblower complaint with the commission in March, accusing the defendants and the governor's office of "retaliation and interference" with her business relationships.
The lawsuit also accuses Howse of sexual harassment and alleges he treated Pitts "differently based on her gender."
Howse called Pitts on her personal cellphone, commented she was "cute," told her "you need to remember that I'm only married 75 percent of the time," and "repeatedly asked plaintiff to have drinks with him and loosen up," the lawsuit alleges. It contends she was "terminated/constructively discharged" after rejecting the advances.
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 2Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 3UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 4Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 56th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250