Employer Alert: DOL Issues Final Rule Extending Overtime to Over 1 Million Employees
The Department of Labor estimates the change will make about 1.2 million employees who are exempt from overtime under the current rule entitled to overtime pay.
September 26, 2019 at 04:18 PM
4 minute read
The Department of Labor announced Tuesday that it will finally be implementing changes to the white-collar overtime exemption contained in the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The exemption, which generally applies to those who work in an executive, administrative or professional capacity, has not been modified since April 2004. Under the law, a person would be considered exempt from overtime at time and one-half pay if that person met each of the following criteria: the employee is paid a predetermined and fixed salary that is not subject to reduction based on quantity or quality of work under the salary basis test, the amount of the salary met a minimum amount under a salary level test and the employee's job duties primarily involve executive, administrative or professional duties under the duties test.
Since 2004, the salary level test has been met if the employee earned at least $455 per week, which was about the 20th percentile of full-time salaried employees in the South and within the retail industry nationally.
The DOL sought to set a threshold salary where most people who made at least that much per week fell into the category of either an executive, administrative or professional employee as those terms are defined under the regulations (29 CFR Part 541). However, millions of Americans earn at least $23,660 per year and therefore were not entitled to overtime pay.
In an effort to reconcile the rule with the current economic realities, in 2016 the Obama administration proposed a change to the minimum threshold salary amount to $913 per week, or $47,476 annually. The final rule published in May 2016 was challenged in court, and ultimately the DOL was enjoined from implementing the 2016 final rule by a Texas U.S. district judge.
The DOL subsequently proposed a modified salary level of $679 per week, or $35,308 annually, which was derived using the same method as the 2004 salary level but using current statistics. After a comment period where there were over 116,000 comments, the DOL announced that, effective Jan. 1, 2020, this new minimum salary requirement for executive, professional and administrative employees will be set at $679 per week.
The DOL estimates that this change will make about 1.2 million employees who are currently exempt from overtime under the current rule entitled to overtime pay. The final rule also changes the salary threshold for the highly compensated employee, or HCE, exemption from $100,000 annually to $147,414 annually. This change is expected to provide overtime eligibility to approximately 100,000 employees who currently are considered exempt under the HCE exemption.
The DOL may face litigation related to the implementation. However, it appears that an increase to the salary threshold for white collar employees is inevitable, whether it occurs on Jan. 1 or later.
Employers are encouraged to assess their workforce now to determine what changes need to be made. The biggest changes will need to be made with regard to employees currently classified as exempt who work substantial amounts of overtime and whose compensation is now below the new salary threshold.
Note that the new rule permits employers to count nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments towards up to 10% of the salary threshold so long as those bonuses are paid at least annually.
Assuming these employees meet both the salary basis and duties tests, but make less than $679 per week, employers have a couple of options. First, employers can increase the employee's salary to the new minimum. Alternatively, employers can change the employee to an hourly employee, thus making the employee nonexempt. The employee's hourly rate can be adjusted downward to allow for additional overtime pay that the employee would now be entitled to receive.
Employers should also be on the lookout for the announcement of other final rules which will make further changes to the FLSA. A notice was issued in March which sought comments on a proposed rule amending 29 CFR Part 778 related to how an employee's "regular rate" is calculated. The comment period has closed, and a final rule on this issue is expected in the coming months.
Elizabeth P. Johnson is a shareholder at Fowler White Burnett in Miami, where she focuses on labor and employment Law. Contact her at [email protected]. Lindsay M. Massillon is a Miami associate focused on labor and employment law and commercial litigation. Contact her at LMassillon@fowler-white.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Commentary: James Madicon, Meet Matt Gaetz
- 2The Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
- 3Leopard Solutions Launches AI Navigator, a Gen AI Search, Data Extraction Tool
- 4Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 5Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250