Coral Gables Appeals Styrofoam Ban to Florida Supreme Court
Coral Gables is trying to bring its case before the state Supreme Court, after an Aug. 14 opinion by the Third District Court of Appeal held the city could not enforce its ordinance against the sale or use of polystyrene containers.
October 01, 2019 at 04:00 PM
3 minute read
The city of Coral Gables is working to bring an August order by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal before the state Supreme Court.
The Third DCA issued an opinion on Aug. 14 ruling Coral Gables' local ordinance banning the sale and use of polystyrene — a plastic foam generally used to store food and widely known as its branded iteration Styrofoam — could not be enforced under existing state law. Now, the city is drafting a motion to invoke the jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court.
The move follows an August vote by the Coral Gables City Commission to appeal the Third DCA's order. According to Coral Gables City Attorney Miriam Ramos, the decision to petition the Florida Supreme Court was born out of necessity.
"We asked the Third DCA to certify the question to the Florida Supreme Court, and our motion was denied," Ramos told the Daily Business Review.
The Sept. 19 order by the appellate court prompted the city to begin working on its motion to invoke jurisdiction.
Ramos noted once the motion is filed, it will fall upon the Florida Supreme Court to decide whether Coral Gables' fight to enact eco-friendly regulations will proceed in court.
"The commission feels strongly, as does our office, that this issue is one of great public importance," Ramos said. "Given the significant environmental concerns associated with these products, there are dozens of municipalities throughout the state that stand prepared to adopt ordinances banning polystyrene and single-use plastic bags but are unable to do so, given these statutes."
The appeals court's opinion reversed and remanded a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judgment deeming the contested Florida Statutes mentioned by Ramos — sections 403.708(9), 403.7033, and 500.90 — unconstitutional.
The Florida Retail Federation served as the plaintiff in the June 2016 lawsuit against Coral Gables over its polystyrene-prohibiting law. Scott Shalley, the president and CEO of the Tallahassee-based business interest group, did not return requests for comment by deadline.
Bonnie Malloy, a staff attorney with environmental law group Earthjustice's Florida Branch, filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Coral Gables during the appellate proceedings. Malloy said in emailed remarks to the Daily Business Review that the city has her continued support .
"It's clear that Coral Gables is doing all it can to keep its community clean," she said. "It's a shame that powerful corporations — and their friends in the Florida Legislature — keep trying to step on the rights of Florida cities and counties like Coral Gables. If a community wants to pass a law to cut down on plastics or other litter, they should be able to do that without having to go to the Florida Supreme Court."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 2SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About,' Says Jennifer A. Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 4Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 5St. Ivo: Patron Saint of Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250