Coral Gables Appeals Styrofoam Ban to Florida Supreme Court
Coral Gables is trying to bring its case before the state Supreme Court, after an Aug. 14 opinion by the Third District Court of Appeal held the city could not enforce its ordinance against the sale or use of polystyrene containers.
October 01, 2019 at 04:00 PM
3 minute read
Styrofoam food containers in bins. Photo: wk1003mike/Shutterstock.com
The city of Coral Gables is working to bring an August order by Florida's Third District Court of Appeal before the state Supreme Court.
The Third DCA issued an opinion on Aug. 14 ruling Coral Gables' local ordinance banning the sale and use of polystyrene — a plastic foam generally used to store food and widely known as its branded iteration Styrofoam — could not be enforced under existing state law. Now, the city is drafting a motion to invoke the jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court.
The move follows an August vote by the Coral Gables City Commission to appeal the Third DCA's order. According to Coral Gables City Attorney Miriam Ramos, the decision to petition the Florida Supreme Court was born out of necessity.
"We asked the Third DCA to certify the question to the Florida Supreme Court, and our motion was denied," Ramos told the Daily Business Review.
The Sept. 19 order by the appellate court prompted the city to begin working on its motion to invoke jurisdiction.
Ramos noted once the motion is filed, it will fall upon the Florida Supreme Court to decide whether Coral Gables' fight to enact eco-friendly regulations will proceed in court.
"The commission feels strongly, as does our office, that this issue is one of great public importance," Ramos said. "Given the significant environmental concerns associated with these products, there are dozens of municipalities throughout the state that stand prepared to adopt ordinances banning polystyrene and single-use plastic bags but are unable to do so, given these statutes."
The appeals court's opinion reversed and remanded a Miami-Dade Circuit Court judgment deeming the contested Florida Statutes mentioned by Ramos — sections 403.708(9), 403.7033, and 500.90 — unconstitutional.
The Florida Retail Federation served as the plaintiff in the June 2016 lawsuit against Coral Gables over its polystyrene-prohibiting law. Scott Shalley, the president and CEO of the Tallahassee-based business interest group, did not return requests for comment by deadline.
Bonnie Malloy, a staff attorney with environmental law group Earthjustice's Florida Branch, filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Coral Gables during the appellate proceedings. Malloy said in emailed remarks to the Daily Business Review that the city has her continued support .
"It's clear that Coral Gables is doing all it can to keep its community clean," she said. "It's a shame that powerful corporations — and their friends in the Florida Legislature — keep trying to step on the rights of Florida cities and counties like Coral Gables. If a community wants to pass a law to cut down on plastics or other litter, they should be able to do that without having to go to the Florida Supreme Court."
Related stories:
Styrofoam is Back: Florida Appellate Court Strikes Down Coral Gables' Ban, Prohibits Similar Laws
South Florida Litigators Haggle Over Environmental Impact of Deregulation Under Trump
Miami Lawyer Uses Coral Gables' Own Filing to Clinch an Appellate Victory Against It
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over USAID Stop-Work Orders Trump Administration Faces Lawsuit Over USAID Stop-Work Orders](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/16/79/000bb9704808a73fcde73947ecfd/trump-oval-office-767x633.jpg)
![Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/28/90/106b497d4c2abf86218e4414ada2/attorney-fees-767x633.jpg)
Plaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute read![US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/nationallawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/398/2024/10/Trump-Cannon-767x633.jpg)
US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute read![New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/98/ca/4dd6a947421bbc9c53aad7b8dd51/allstate-insurance-2-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Trade Wars: Five Tips for Legal Teams to Manage Tariffs and Trade in Trump II
- 2Balancing Attorney-Client Privilege With a Lawyer’s Right to Defend Against Allegations of Wrongdoing
- 3Public Interest Calendar of Events
- 4Sharpening Residential Insurance Fraud Defense Strategies: Insights for Insurers to Mitigate Risk in 2025
- 5Reversal of Fortune: Restoring Owners’ Equity Under New Jersey’s Tax Sale Law
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250