Cohen Milstein Partner Appointed Lead Counsel in General Motors Class Action
Litigator Theodore J. Leopold is helping to represent a national class in legal action against the automotive company. An amended complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on Monday alleges GM was aware several vehicles manufactured between 2015 and 2019 contained defective eight-speed automatic transmissions and did nothing to warn customers.
October 02, 2019 at 03:21 PM
4 minute read
A South Florida law partner has been named lead counsel in a nationwide class action against General Motors LLC.
Cohen Milstein partner Theodore J. Leopold was appointed to the position by U.S. District Judge David M. Larson. The Palm Beach Gardens-based attorney is part of the legal team representing plaintiffs from more than 30 states in a putative consumer class action against GM in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
An amended complaint filed Monday consolidated previous suits against GM and contended the automotive company knowingly concealed a defect in its vehicles from customers. According to the suit, two faulty models of eight-speed automatic transmissions have caused widespread problems for GM vehicle owners in recent years. The plaintiffs allege vehicles manufactured by the defendant between 2015 and 2019 with the GM 8L90 or 8L45 transmissions suffer from a shared problem, which causes the vehicles to jerk and sputter.
"The class vehicles were sold with a defective 8L90 or 8L45 transmissions that, among other things, slip, buck, kick, jerk and harshly engage, suffer abnormal internal wear, sudden acceleration, delay in downshifts, delayed acceleration, difficulty stopping the vehicle, and eventually require replacement of the transmission or its components," the complaint said. "This defect, which manifests itself within the limited warranty period or shortly after the limited warranty period expires, can cause unsafe conditions in the Class Vehicles, including but not limited vehicles suddenly lurching forward, sudden loss of forward propulsion, and significant delays in acceleration."
The suit argues because the movements described affect a driver's ability to control their car's speed, acceleration, and deceleration, the problems associated with the transmissions pose a safety hazard to users.
Read the complaint:
A defense attorney for GM, Grant A. Newman with Michigan law firm Bush Seyferth, said the company's legal counsel was not authorized to speak on the case.
GM's manager for news relations on legal and corporate issues, David Caldwell, declined to comment on the amended complaint, beyond calling the filing "another step for an existing issue."
Caldwell said customers concerned about their GM vehicles should visit their local dealerships to address any issues.
Meanwhile, the complaint filed Monday lists 61 plaintiffs and proposes a class that comprises U.S. residents who leased or purchased new and used vehicles containing the alleged defect. There are 104 individualized charges comporting to the respective consumer protection laws for the 32 states in the suit, as well as claims of breach of warranty, unjust enrichment and fraudulent omission on behalf of the nationwide class.
"GM failed to disclose the transmission defect to plaintiff and class members through its advertising," the suit said. "On information and belief, owners have complained of dangerous driving conditions and near-accidents because of the transmission defect. However, GM continues to sell the dangerously defective vehicles to consumers."
Leopold told the Daily Business Review the "panoply of different issues" described in the complaint is supported by ample evidence, including extensive testimonies posted online by GM customers.
"Every time the vehicles are brought in for repairs, adjustments etc., the problems never go away," the attorney said. "None of the fixes GM tried to do ever worked, and the problems kept persisting."
Leopold added, "There was an accumulation of people around the country. It took a few years but it's now sort of a snowball effect."
The plaintiffs are seeking damages for overpaying for the purportedly defective vehicles, as well as losses on diminished resale value and repair costs. Leopold said he anticipates GM will file a motion to dismiss the case, and the plaintiffs in turn intend to respond accordingly.
Leopold is joined on the case by fellow Cohen Milstein attorney Douglas James McNamara, as well as litigators from Philadelphia firm Berger Montague and the Miller Law Firm in Michigan.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Claims Against Lilium N.V. for Electric Plane Production Delays Fail to Take Flight, Federal Judge Holds
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250