Ex-Florida Judge Suspended in DC for Accepting Baseball Tickets From Attorneys
Former Manatee Circuit Judge John Lakin received a reciprocal suspension from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals for accepting baseball tickets from attorneys.
October 03, 2019 at 05:52 PM
4 minute read
A Washington, D.C., appeals court Thursday suspended former Miami attorney and Manatee Circuit Judge John F. Lakin from practicing law for two years, matching punishment Lakin received from the Florida Supreme Court in May.
The Florida Bar accused Lakin of asking for and accepting tickets to watch three Tampa Bay Rays baseball games from two Palmetto lawyers with a case pending before him.
Lakin ordered a new trial in the case, which benefited the lawyers' client.
Attorneys Melton Little and Scott Kallins represented the plaintiffs in a slip-and-fall case against Walmart Inc. Jurors returned a defense verdict, but a court-appointed referee found Lakin had accepted one set of tickets and requested another, before granting a new trial for the plaintiff.
Lakin disclosed during a status conference that he'd accepted the tickets. He then recused himself from the case, according to the referee's report. But the gifts led to an ethics charge and the end of his stint as a Florida judge.
Lakin resigned in March 2016, ending a Judicial Qualifications Commission ethics investigation. Little and Kallins both received 18-month suspensions.
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals rejected Lakin's argument that the court should accept the referee's recommended 90-day suspension, instead of the Florida Supreme Court's harsher discipline and five-year suspension. But just as the Florida high court had done, its D.C. counterpart opted to suspend the attorney.
"To the extent respondent argues that his actions would not constitute an ethical violation in this jurisdiction, or that this jurisdiction would impose a substantially different and reduced sanction, he is mistaken," the per curiam ruling said.
Lakin argued it would be an injustice to receive reciprocal discipline, but the court found he had failed to explain why.
"Respondent merely attempts to reargue his sanctions and refers to his years of experience. However, discipline is imposed to protect the public and to safeguard the integrity of the legal system," the ruling said.
Lakin's attorney, Tracy Kramer of Lakinslaw in Miami, pointed to her client's answer brief in the Florida Bar case, and said they respectfully disagree with the ruling,
"The Florida Supreme Court's two-year suspension was eight times that recommended by [referee] Judge Hayward, without any legal justification," Kramer said. "Mr. Lakin is a man of character and is ethical. Four circuit court judges testified Mr. Lakin had no corruptive intent, and would not have compromised the process, that the tickets had no influence on his four-page written decision to overturn the Walmart verdict."
Lakin testified in the Florida proceedings that he was remorseful, but stressed that the tickets had no bearing on his ruling, as he recalled being stunned by the jury's verdict. Lakin claimed he'd struggled with the transition from attorney to judge, saying, "I did not anticipate the level of scrutiny day-to-day on individual decisions I would make as a judge by outside factors," according to the referee's report.
It was the first disciplinary incident for Lakin, who was admitted to the Florida Bar in 2001. He rose to the bench in 2012, after working at Bradenton firms Barnes Walker and Lakin Smith.
Lakin began his legal career in Boston, Massachusetts, in 1990, and is still eligible to practice in the state, according to the Board of Bar Overseers.
|Read the opinion:
|More discipline stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenworth Accused of Predatory Tactics in Foreclosure Dispute as Elderly Defendant's Health Deteriorates
4 minute read'Get Rid of the Men': Employer Accused of Discrimination
Trending Stories
- 1Cyberattacks Slowing Down M&A Deals, Firm Report Finds
- 2$10 Million Settlement Reached for Baby Injured by Disconnected Ventilator
- 3King & Spalding Leaves Texas Patent Case After Client Stops Paying
- 4Knowable Launches Generative AI-Powered Tool Suite Ask Knowable
- 5Pike Fuels Agrees to Pay $2 Million Settlement to Resolve Alleged New Haven Environmental Violations
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250