Prosecutors Appeal Ruling Banning Prostitution Video of Patriots Owner
The state is challenging a decision ejecting surveillance video from the prosecution of New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft.
October 03, 2019 at 03:56 PM
5 minute read
A judge made several errors when he threw out video evidence allegedly showing New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft twice paying for sex at a South Florida massage parlor, prosecutors argued in a court papers to keep alive their case against one of the NFL's most prominent personalities.
The state attorney general's office filed its argument with the Fourth District Court of Appeal late Tuesday, just before a deadline that otherwise likely would have meant the dismissal of Kraft's second-degree misdemeanor charge. It said Palm Beach County Court Judge Leonard Hanser made several errors in his May ruling and argued that even if he didn't, he went too far by suppressing the recordings police secretly made in January at the Orchids of Asia Day Spa.
They said Hanser erred when he ruled Jupiter police detectives and the judge who issued the warrant allowing the secret installation of cameras at the spa did not do enough to minimize the invasion of privacy of customers who received legal massages. They said even if justices agree with Hanser that more should have been done to protect the innocent, it shouldn't protect Kraft, whom they say clearly paid for sex.
They also argued that even if the warrant was faulty, the detectives executed it in good faith, which courts have ruled is usually sufficient for evidence to be used in court, because doing otherwise allows criminal activity to go unpunished.
The prosecutors said Jupiter police detectives lawfully obtained the warrant allowing them to secretly install cameras in the spa's massage rooms and lobby, after spending days observing almost exclusively men entering the spa, obtaining trash that showed sex occurred there and interviewing customers after they left who admitted paying for sex.
During the five days of recording, prosecutors said 25 customers clearly paid for sex, 10 likely did but could not be proven because of poor lighting and four did not. Kraft was one of 25 men charged and some have accepted plea bargains. The owner and some employees are charged with felonies, with those cases also stalled because of similar rulings tossing the videos that are under appeal.
"That the spa was regularly used as a brothel is confirmed by the small percentage of recorded massages that ultimately appeared lawful," state Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey DeSousa wrote.
If the appeal fails, prosecutors will likely have to drop their case against Kraft, a widower worth $6 billion whose Palm Beach mansion is across a bridge from the spa.
Kraft, 78, pleaded not guilty but issued a written apology in March, acknowledging he disappointed many people "who rightfully hold me to a higher standard." A spokesman for his attorneys did not immediately respond to a phone call and email Wednesday seeking comment.
According to police records, Kraft was chauffeured to the spa on the evening of Jan. 19, where officers secretly recorded him engaging in a sex act with two women and then handing over an undetermined amount of cash. Investigators said Kraft returned 17 hours later and was again videotaped engaging in sex acts with a woman before paying with a $100 bill and another bill, police said.
Only hours after that, Kraft was in Kansas City for the AFC Championship game, where his Patriots defeated the Chiefs. His team then won the Super Bowl in Atlanta, the Patriots' sixth NFL championship under his ownership.
The NFL has issued no sanctions against Kraft, but has said it is monitoring the case.
Hanser in his ruling said the judge who issued the warrant failed to give Jupiter detectives explicit instructions on how to monitor the video feed, allowing them to invade the privacy of legitimate customers.
"The fact that some totally innocent women and men had their entire lawful time spent in a massage room fully recorded and viewed intermittently by a detective-monitor is unacceptable," Hanser wrote.
While prosecutors are arguing that ruling is faulty on several fronts, they focused on whether the recordings illegally violated Kraft's privacy.
First, they said Kraft had less of an expectation of privacy when he went to a public business to engage in an illegal activity.
Also, there was no way for detectives to know if a massage was illegal until it was over, so viewing someone disrobing and naked was allowed under the warrant, DeSousa wrote. He disputed defense arguments that the detectives should have only viewed the first five minutes of video showing each customer before switching off the feed, and then turning it on again only periodically to check for evidence of a crime.
If "viewing the first five minutes of a massage was acceptable, it is hard to conceive why viewing the rest of the massage should be deemed constitutionally impermissible — particularly when the evidence sought to be obtained was the so-called 'happy ending' that, by definition, takes place at the conclusion," DeSousa wrote.
The appeals court has not scheduled oral arguments. No matter which way the justices rule, the losing side will likely appeal to the Florida Supreme Court.
Terry Spencer reports for the Associated Press.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1Volunteers Unreimbursed Expenses — Tax Incentives For Itemizers
- 2Carter Mario Achieves $225,000 Settlement in Motor Vehicle Case
- 3Legal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
- 4'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
- 5SEC Penalizes Wells Fargo, LPL Financial $900,000 Each for Inaccurate Trading Data
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250