State Medical Board Backs 'Brazilian Butt Lift' Rules
Board of Medicine Chairman Steven Rosenberg said Florida consumers must have a better understanding of dangers associated with liposuction, and physicians need to "really think twice about providing those services."
October 07, 2019 at 11:58 AM
3 minute read
A medical board took steps to carry out a new law related to so-called Brazilian butt lift procedures, but one top regulator said a growing danger still needs to be addressed: liposuction.
Board of Medicine Chairman Steven Rosenberg said Florida consumers must have a better understanding of dangers associated with liposuction, and physicians need to "really think twice about providing those services."
Medical doctors are not required to be board-certified to provide plastic surgery. While hospitals can put requirements on physicians, patients seeking liposuction can have the work done outside hospitals.
Most plastic surgery procedures are done on an outpatient basis.
"We can determine what procedures can be done and how they should be done. And that's something the board has, and probably will address further," Rosenberg said. "But when it comes to who is qualified to do procedures, the Board of Medicine unfortunately has its hands tied."
That means patients need to be better informed about the physicians they are seeking out to provide the services, Rosenberg said at a Board of Medicine meeting in Tampa.
Rosenberg's warning about liposuction came as the Board of Medicine amended disciplinary rules to fine physicians $5,000 a day for failing to register their offices if they perform Brazilian butt lifts, a type of procedure that involves injecting fat into buttocks. The assessment is accompanied by a potential 12-month license suspension or probation. The board is authorized to revoke licenses for repeated offenses.
The fine was set in a law (SB 732) that was passed by the Legislature this year to crack down on rogue health-care clinics that provide Brazilian butt lifts. Liposuction is part of that procedure.
It's the second time in as many months that the board chairman warned about dangers associated with plastic surgery.
Rosenberg's remarks Friday came on the heels of the board considering two disciplinary cases related to liposuction-only procedures.
The board approved levying a $20,000 fine against Jan V. Karlin for liposuction on 63-year old diabetic patient identified by the initials "R.C."
The patient's bowel was perforated multiple times during the suction-assisted lipectomy procedure performed on June 24, 2014, according to the Department of Health which investigated the incident. The patient subsequently died.
Karlin, who has been licensed in Florida since 1973, told the board he did not know what he did to cause the injuries.
The board also hit Nagy Farag with a $5,000 fine for liposuction he performed on a patient's legs in mid-September 2013. The patient saw Farag nine times between Sept. 27, 2013 and Oct. 23, 2013, when she was admitted to the hospital with an infection that causes skin tissue to die, according to the state.
Farag also is required to be evaluated by a board-approved evaluator and have his practice locations reviewed by a health-care risk manager.
The board also hit Farag with a $22,546.69 bill to reimburse the state for its costs of prosecuting the case.
Meanwhile, the board on Friday also agreed to amend its rules to fine physicians who don't comply with a new law meant to abate the state's opioid crisis by requiring doctors to offer non-opioid alternatives to patients.
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
- 2Florida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
- 3Supreme Court Drops Facebook's Appeal in Securities Case as 'Improvidently Granted'
- 4Newsmakers: Scott Bailey Joins Jones Day’s Corporate Practice in Dallas
- 5The Swinging Pendulum of Title IX Politics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250