Use Checklists to Help Hone Your Craft
Some refer to the practice of law as part art and part craft. My experience tells me that everything I do as a lawyer can be reduced to a process. Intuition plays a role.
October 09, 2019 at 10:03 AM
5 minute read
Editor's note: The following is an excerpt from Francisco Ramos Jr.'s new book published by the American Bar Association titled "The Practice and Process of Law: Checklists for Every Occasion."
|The Process of the Practice
Some refer to the practice of law as part art and part craft. My experience tells me that everything I do as a lawyer can be reduced to a process. Intuition plays a role. Sometimes luck plays a role. But for most aspects, there is a process that if followed leads to success. Most everything we do as a lawyer is a task that can be reduced to a series of steps—a checklist. By following these checklists we not only avoid mistakes but we ensure achieving our goals, both small and large. When I teach legal skills, I invariably share the steps I follow with my audience. Taking a deposition? I have a checklist. Defending a deposition? I have a checklist. Writing an article? I have a checklist. Most lawyers, whether they are conscious about it or not, have mental checklists they follow whether it's getting ready for a hearing, mediation of trial. They follow certain procedures when interviewing a witness, drafting a pleading or negotiating a settlement. Most of the practice is a process, and by shifting the paradigm from art and craft to process, we can improve quality, efficiency and results.
|How Do Lawyers Learn the Practice?
It's a common refrain among lawyers that law school doesn't teach you how to be a lawyer. You learn to be a lawyer by being a lawyer. Most lawyers learn from more experienced lawyers, who mentor them in an apprenticeship model. Experienced lawyers teach young lawyers how to write, how to argue, how to depose, how to negotiate and how to try cases. Experienced lawyers convey their processes to their mentees. Based on trial and error, success and failures, experienced lawyers share their wisdom, which if dissected, are a series of do's and don'ts, a collection of checklists that guide behavior and achieve results. Whether we realize it or not, we lawyers teach and learn through checklists. That's how the military does it. That's how fortune 500 companies do it. They do it because processes work, checklists work, step-by-step guides work. They're tested, provide consistency and evolve to address changes. Processes and checklists have a proven track record. We lawyers learn the practice by following others' checklists or developing our own.
|How Do Lawyers Improve?
We lawyers get better at being lawyers by learning from others, learning from our own experiences, CLE, publications, webinars and seminars. When we reflect upon memorable advice, articles or presentations they generally convey "how to do X," which adds one or more steps, or modifies one or more steps, when performing one or more legal tasks. I remember learning how to get an adverse witness to say "yes," how to develop trial themes and how to prepare for trial. Whether conscious or not, we grasp onto the way others to do things and make their processes our own, or modify our processes to reflect theirs.
|Reducing the Practice to a Process
It sounds blasphemous to convert a trade into a process. But that's what has happened to many artisanal careers. The assembly line transformed the auto industry, improving quality and reducing costs. Most manufacturing today is a process that incorporates the best of man and machine to make better products in less time and for less money. Much of the practice can be reduced to a process. Business development can be reduced to a process. Client relations can be reduced to a process. Trying a case can be reduced to one too. If there is a way to do your job better with less effort and better results, why not explore and pursue it? Viewing our profession through the prism of process will improve customer service and work product. The profession isn't so sacrosanct to ignore the value of pursuing and implementing process. It will be better for us doing so.
|Reducing the Process to Checklists
Once you're committed to the practice as process, the next logical step is to reduce the process to checklists. If you agree that you will be a better trial lawyer by reducing trying cases to a process, list all the tasks you perform as a trial lawyer and reduce each task to a series of to do's, one to do leading from the last into the next, which when followed, improves efficiency and quality. This doesn't mean you shouldn't create your own. Reducing a task to its basic elements, listing them in order and studying how individual steps can be improved upon to improve upon the performance of the overall task is a great teaching tool. It's akin to teaching mechanics how to disassemble a car, part by part, and put it back together. This reductionism and reassembly makes you better at your craft.
Reprinted with permission of Francisco Ramos Jr. He is the managing partner of Clarke Silverglate in Miami, where he practices in the areas of commercial litigation, drug and medical device, products and catastrophic personal injury.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250