Court Denies Attorney's Claim to Coconut Grove Property in Familial Dispute
Florida's Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court order granting summary judgment against Chicago-based lawyer Adeena Weiss Ortiz on Thursday. Ortiz had filed suit against her mother and sister over her father's estate.
October 11, 2019 at 03:26 PM
3 minute read
Florida's Third District Court of Appeal has rejected an attorney's claim to her father's estate and properties in Coconut Grove.
The appellate court affirmed the final judgment issued against Adeena Weiss Ortiz in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The underlying case concerned the complaint entered by Ortiz — who lives and works in Chicago but is licensed to practice law in Florida — against her mother Caroline Weiss, her sister Alitza's trust and other parties in May 2014.
The amended complaint filed in July 2016 charged Ortiz's mother with fraudulently transferring property to make herself the sole titleholder. The estate, which comprises a house and seven lots on Royal Road in Coconut Grove, includes bayfront property and was left behind by Ortiz's father and Weiss' late husband Jack.
According to the Third DCA's opinion, the deceased man was a Miami-based attorney who bought the land with Weiss in 1973.
Ortiz contended in her lawsuit that JAAC Inc., the Florida corporation used to purchase the properties, stood for "Jack-Adeena-Alitza-Caroline" and that "each Weiss family member was a 25% shareholder," according to Thursday's order. The appeals court noted the plaintiff testified "she had no physical shares, no tax returns, and no other documents confirming such an interest," and had never financially contributed to the property with regards to property taxes, insurance or maintenance.
|
Read the opinion:
Ortiz appealed to the Third DCA after a Nov. 14, 2018 order granting summary judgment was entered against her in Miami-Dade Circuit Court. The appellate panel found no error in the trial court's judgment and concluded Florida's laws concerning the statute of limitations for probate proceedings were correctly applied.
"Ms. Ortiz initiated her claims over 18 years after her father's death," the opinion said, noting the plaintiff's father died in 1995. "Under any scenario, Ms. Ortiz's claim against the estate or her mother, as personal representative or beneficiary, would have to have been filed within the two-year period following the father's death (i.e., by Feb. 21, 1997)."
Neither Ortiz nor her appellate counsel — Elliot B. Kula, Ashley P. Singrossi, and William D. Mueller with Miami appellate firm Kula & Associates — immediately returned requests for comment.
Schlesinger Law Group founder Michael J. Schlesinger represented Weiss and her former husband's estate in both trial and appellate court. He said the dispute was an unfortunately long battle he and his client were thankful to see resolved.
"We believed from the start that this lawsuit was untimely and lacked merit," Schlesinger said. He added Weiss will be looking to develop the properties in light of the litigation's conclusion.
"[Weiss] is a tough lady, and had to put up with a lot over the years from this lawsuit," the attorney said. "She wants to move on."
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250