Commentary

Opportunity Zone Benefit for Investors: Timing Is Key

The Opportunity Zones incentive was created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to encourage long-term investments in low-income urban and rural communities nationwide.

October 14, 2019 at 11:00 AM

3 minute read


Celena R. Nash partner Law Offices of Celena R. Nash, in Coral Springs. Celena R. Nash partner Law Offices of Celena R. Nash, in Coral Springs.

The Opportunity Zones incentive was created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to encourage long-term investments in low-income urban and rural communities nationwide. The initiative operates to encourage economic growth by providing tax benefits to investors thus giving them incentive to re-invest their unrealized capital gains into dedicated qualified opportunity funds (QOF). First, investors can defer tax on any prior gains invested in a QOF until the earlier of the date on which the investment in a QOF is sold or exchanged, or Dec. 31, 2026. A QOF is an investment vehicle set up as a corporation or a partnership for the purposes of investing in an eligible property located in an Opportunity Zone. If the QOF investment is held for longer than five years, there is a 10% exclusion of the deferred gain. If the investment is held for more than seven years, there is a 15% exclusion. Furthermore, if the investor retains the investment in the Opportunity Fund for at least 10 years, the investor is eligible for an increase in the basis of the QOF investment equal to its fair market value on the date that the QOF is sold or exchanged. Significantly, one does not have to reside, work or own a business in the Opportunity Zone to qualify for this tax advantage. To qualify, one must only invest in a recognized gain in a QOF and elect to defer on that gain.

Opportunity zones include a wide array of real estate sectors, including multifamily and affordable housing, industrial developments and mixed-use developments, which include hospitality and retail. Eligible investments are restricted to new developments and capital-intensive renovations, including property repurposing or rehabilitations, ground-up developments, business headquarter expansions and public/private partnerships.

At the present time, there are 8,700 tracts designated as Opportunity Zones, including 427 tracts in Florida, 68 in Miami-Dade and the entirety of Puerto Rico. Florida is in an especially favorable position to benefit from Opportunity Zone investment. In particular, Orlando, West Palm Beach, Tampa, Fort Lauderdale and Miami all appear to be ready to take advantage of this unique investment opportunity. These are all areas where growing populations support strong economic and real estate fundamentals. When combined with the lack of state income taxes in Florida, the dynamics in these markets create an extremely favorable environment for development and investment.

Investors in Florida should retain qualified legal counsel to ensure they are compliant with the rules and regulations and that they receive the full tax benefits. When determining whether or not to invest in an Opportunity Zone, timing is essential. Investors should seek out projects that already have regulatory approval in place. This will not only make the process proceed more expeditiously but will also minimize regulatory risk. Finally, investors should be aware that while all Opportunity Zones are located in economically distressed areas, not all "distress" is the same. In making their decisions, investors should look for areas with strong job, income and population growth and commercial real estate growth.

Real estate attorney Celena R. Nash practices with Law Offices of Celena R. Nash in Coral Springs.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro

    More from ALM