Fort Lauderdale Law Firm Representing Same-Sex Spouse in Lawsuit Against Big Tobacco
Bryan Rintoul is being represented by Jonathan R. Gdanski and attorneys from the Schlesinger Law Offices in his wrongful death claim against R.J. Reynolds and others over the death of his husband Edward Caprio. The firm said it's the first case of its kind to go to trial in the United States.
October 16, 2019 at 04:14 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys from the Schlesinger Law Offices are serving as plaintiffs counsel in the nation's first wrongful death case brought by a same-sex spouse against Big Tobacco to proceed to trial.
Litigators Jonathan R. Gdanski, Brittany C. Barron and Jeffrey L. Haberman are representing Bryan Rintoul in his Engle progeny suit against several tobacco companies in Broward Circuit Court. Rintoul is pursuing legal action against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Philip Morris USA Inc. and Lorillard Tobacco Co. as the personal representative of the estate of Edward Caprio, his late husband.
Opening remarks in the trial were delivered Tuesday, picking up from where a 2015 verdict favoring Caprio left off. Caprio, who contracted chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 1996, filed suit against the defendants on charges of products liability, defective product, negligence, fraudulent concealment and conspiracy to fraudulently conceal material information in 2007.
Although the jury determined the defendants had been negligent and awarded $559,172 to Caprio, no agreement was reached concerning the concealment allegations or the plaintiff's entitlement to non-economic and punitive damages.
The outstanding questions in Caprio's case necessitated an additional jury trial. However, Caprio died Jan. 28, 2018, rendering his allegations unresolved.
Read the motion for leave and amended complaint:
A motion to substitute parties and fourth amended complaint were submitted to the court May 14, 2018. The filings made the case for Rintoul, who had married Caprio after the lawsuit commenced, to serve as the personal representative of his deceased partner's estate and inherit the case. Both the motion and amended complaint noted Caprio had taken steps to list the Engle progeny suit as an asset in his bankruptcy case prior to his death.
The fourth amended complaint reiterated the fraud by concealment and breach of warranty claims against the defendants and sought damages for Caprio's purported wrongful death.
The defendants filed respective motions denying the charges outlined in Rintoul's complaint and asked the court to deny his request to amend the suit. Broward Circuit Judge David A. Haimes subsequently issued an order granting Rintoul's request on Sept. 25, 2018.
Gdanski, Barron and Haberman were unavailable to comment on the suit. A representative with the Schlesinger Law Offices confirmed Caprio and Rintoul's case marked the first time a same-sex couple's wrongful death action against tobacco companies proceeded to trial in the U.S.
Gray Robinson shareholder Eric L. Lundt and Robert C. L. Vaughan of the Kim Vaughan Lerner law firm are part of the legal team representing the defendants. No attorneys from the defense counsel immediately returned requests for comment.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1So You Want to be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
- 2US District Judge in North Carolina Will Take Senior Status
- 3From 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Rollercoaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
- 4Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 5Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250