Morgan & Morgan Client Alleges NY Firm Sank Cruise Case With Missed Deadline
The plaintiff claims her former attorney didn't drop her personal injury case until she could no longer sue Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., thanks to a one-year statute of limitations.
October 17, 2019 at 01:42 PM
4 minute read
An Israeli tourist who had hoped to sue over a nasty fall aboard a Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. ship has retained Morgan & Morgan attorneys in West Palm Beach to accuse her former New York counsel of legal malpractice for allegedly missing a deadline to file suit, barring her claims forever.
It's "an attorney's most basic task," according to 61-year-old Isabelle Cohen's complaint, which claims she's suffered complex regional pain syndrome, or CRPS, in her right hand since slipping on some spilled liquid in the ship's dining room. The syndrome is said to develop after an injury as a result of damaged or malfunctioning nerves.
The accident happened in November 2017, and in February 2018 the plaintiff retained New York personal injury firm Daniella Levi & Associates on a contingency-fee basis. But the complaint claims Levi sent her a letter terminating representation five months after the statute of limitations had expired.
South Florida is the nation's hub for cruise ship litigation, as most major cruise lines are headquartered in Miami and include forum selection clauses on tickets.
Any claims against Royal Caribbean have to be brought within one year, according to the complaint, which meant Cohen had until November 2018. But the defendant firm didn't drop Cohen until March 2019 and allegedly never hinted beforehand that it wasn't going to file a lawsuit.
"After careful consideration and investigation of the facts and circumstances of your accident, we regret that we CANNOT represent you in this matter," the letter said. "Should you desire to consult with another attorney, you should do so IMMEDIATELY. Please be advised that you have a STRICT AND LIMITED TIME PERIOD within which to commence a lawsuit."
While federal law allows three years to file a lawsuit under maritime law, cruise line tickets contract often reduce that to just one year. It's a notoriously small window of opportunity, according to attorneys in the industry, who say they're often scrambling to get records with just a few months to file a lawsuit.
Defendant Levi & Associates did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Jared A. Levy and Aiman Farooq of Morgan & Morgan are handling the plaintiff's case.
"This lawsuit is an effort to right two wrongs suffered by our client—both of which were due to no fault of her own," Levy said. "Had the underlying personal injury case been filed properly, we believe our client would have been entitled to significant damages. We seek to recover the same amount that would have been awarded in the case that should have been filed against the cruise line."
The lawsuit claims Cohen had surgery to help correct her pain, but that it's only gotten worse since then. Doctors have recommended more surgery, but the complaint alleges that would "render her hand useless."
Cohen had expected to recover significant damages before her case disintegrated, according to the suit, which seeks damages, costs and attorney fees for alleged professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.
|Read the complaint:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Supreme Court Paves Way for Attorney Fees Over $100k in Land Dispute
Miami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readHit Song Ignites Multimillion-Dollar Legal Battle in South Florida
Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250