South Florida Lawyers Clinch $13 Million Verdict in Wrongful-Death Case
Richard K. Slinkman and Ryan J. Wynne with the Slinkman, Slinkman & Wynne law firm represented the estate of Michelle Anderson in Alachua Circuit Court.
October 21, 2019 at 03:16 PM
7 minute read
Litigators with a Jupiter law firm helped secure a $13 million verdict for the estate of an Alachua County woman killed in a head-on car collision.
Richard K. Slinkman and Ryan J. Wynne of Slinkman, Slinkman & Wynne represented family members of Michelle Anderson in Alachua Circuit Court.
A jury verdict delivered Aug. 16 determined Anderson's husband, Emanuel, and her children were entitled to damages for pain and suffering, as well as compensation for loss of companionship.
The wrongful-death suit was filed against the estate of Calvin Lee Adams III on Jan. 19, 2017. Adams and Anderson both died on the morning of Nov. 14, 2016, as Adams was trying to bypass traffic on Southwest Williston Road in Alachua County, according to court pleadings. As noted by Slinkman, the two-lane road — south of Gainesville's city limits — had slow traffic on the day of the crash.
"Michelle Anderson was heading … home in Williston to drop off a permit for a home they were building," Slinkman said.
Adams, who was driving an SUV, decided to cross the road's no-passing zone in order to get ahead of the eight vehicles preceding him, the attorney said.
"When he tried to pass the cars he was going about 90 mph," Slinkman said. "When he struck Michelle head on, [Adams] killed her and killed himself."
Adams' estate was represented by Trevor G. Hawes and Matthew M. Whiddon of Cole, Scott & Kissane's Jacksonville office. Neither lawyer returned requests for comment by deadline.
Slinkman came onto the case after being contacted by a semi-retired colleague representing the Andersons. That attorney had signaled his retirement was forthcoming, prompting Slinkman and Wynne to join as plaintiffs legal counsel.
Despite the death and other circumstances that led to their introduction, Slinkman said Anderson's husband and three children were "by far some of the nicest clients" he's ever had in his career. The attorney said Anderson and her husband had been married for nearly 12 years.
"Emanuel Anderson's job was working with troubled youth, mentoring them and trying to get them back on the correct path in life," Slinkman said, adding the Andersons were "more in love than any couple I've had the pleasure of knowing in my life."
Anderson's husband was returning from a mission trip in Missouri on the day of the crash.
"They'd literally fallen asleep FaceTiming each other the night before," Slinkman said.
Adams was insured by Progressive at the time of his death. According to Slinkman, the lawsuit was prompted by the insurance company's failure to send two agreed-upon checks for $10,000 to Anderson's family in a timely fashion. The attorney said the policies on the vehicle were for Adams and his mother, as the two of them lived together.
Slinkman said it took Progressive 60 days to tender the $20,000 to Anderson's family. The attorney said the auto negligence complaint was filed before the final check was received and focused on claims of non-economic damages.
Read the verdict form:
"I think the non-economic damages were so extreme in this case because they were such a close family, [and] I didn't want to distract from those," Slinkman said.
Although Anderson was employed as an assistant with the University of Florida's fiscal department for 16 years, the lawyer opted not to seek economic damages as to not "belittle" the estate's other claims.
Slinkman said the defense admitted negligence, leaving the question of damages as the only issue that needed to be resolved at trial.
Slinkman said although the trial reinforced the bond of the "very strong, very tight and loving" family, testimony still proved excruciating for Anderson's surviving relatives.
"We had each of the children and the husband testify," he said. "We had hoped Progressive would've tried to come forward to resolve the case and not put the family through the trial. but they chose not to. We heard from family and friends of [Anderson], and it was a very emotional and very difficult case to try from an emotional point of view."
Slinkman said the plaintiffs emphasized just how loved Anderson was to the jury. This included sharing the story of how Anderson and her husband met, as well as noting that co-workers preserved her memory by placing photographs in her parking space for some time after the accident.
Slinkman said Anderson's estate asked the jury to award $11 million to each of her surviving family members. The defense countered and argued the damages should be limited to between $500,000 and $750,000 for each person.
"Emanuel had remarried and has an infant child now, so that was something that was a little difficult to get the jury to understand," Slinkman said, referencing arguments deployed by Adams' estate. "I think the defense's perspective was he had moved on, which he hadn't."
The attorney said he and Wynne had to bring attention to the struggles experienced by Anderson's husband after her death, even in his new marriage.
"[Emanuel] recognizes it's not fair to the new wife, and he can't let go of what he and Michelle had," Slinkman said. The attorney noted "the cruelest twist of fate" that Anderson's husband buried her on Nov. 26, 2016, the anniversary of the 2004 date when they made their relationship official and just one day after Emanuel Anderson's birthday.
"This is a very, very sad case," Slinkman said.
The jury's $13 million verdict allotted $2.5 million to Anderson's husband and $3.5 million to each of her children.
Slinkman attributed the size of the jury's award to the affecting nature of the family's testimony. The attorney said remarks made by Anderson's daughter, Aaliyah Decoursey ,hit him the hardest.
"She said, 'If I could have just five more minutes with my mom, I'd do anything … because I never got to say goodbye,' " Slinkman said. "And I think that just kind of says it all. The fact her mother was taken so suddenly, and in such a violent fashion that they couldn't even have an open casket, is just awful."
Slinkman said the very family has been "very, very thankful" in the wake of the trial and verdict.
"Emanuel came up to us afterward and said, 'If I don't get a dime after this it doesn't matter. … You've really helped us heal,' " Slinkman said. "It was awesome we could give them that. Aaliyah, she's a senior in high school this year. She came up to me, gave me one of her senior photos and said, 'You're part of the family now.' And that just means everything."
Case: Emanuel Anderson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michelle Anderson v. Estate of Calvin Adams III
Case no.: 01-2017-CA-000221
Description: Wrongful death automobile accident
Filing date: Jan. 19, 2017
Verdict date: Aug. 16, 2019
Judge: Alachua Circuit Judge Monica J. Brasington
Plaintiffs attorneys: Richard K. Slinkman and Ryan J. Wynne, of Slinkman, Slinkman & Wynne, Jupiter
Defense attorneys: Trevor G. Hawes and Matthew M. Whiddon of Cole, Scott & Kissane, Jacksonville
Verdict amount: $13 million
Read More:
South Florida Litigators Net $24.5 Million Verdict for Family in Wrongful Death Suit
$1.75M Settlement, Claims Bill for Family of Bicyclist Killed by Miami-Dade County Bus
Broward Lawyers Quadruple Arbitration Award With $2.2M Verdict for Cyclist Hit by Car
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAutomaker Pleads Guilty and Agrees to $1.6 Billion in Payouts
'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
Florida Retention Ponds Scrutinized in Lawsuit After Latest Child Drowning
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250