Ousted Sheriff Israel's Lawyer Says More Litigation Possible After Florida Senate Vote
Miami-based litigator Benedict Kuehne, who represents former Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel, is evaluating whether legal action will follow a vote by the Florida Senate to uphold Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' removal of the ex-sheriff from office.
October 24, 2019 at 03:47 PM
3 minute read
The Miami-based litigator representing former Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel is evaluating whether more legal action will follow a vote by the Florida Senate to uphold Israel's ouster from office by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Benedict "Ben" Kuehne said Israel has authorized him to determine if the law enforcement officer's forced removal from his elected position constituted a violation of due process.
"If there is an actionable denial of due process that infringed the people's right to choose their sheriff by election, then there will be an opportunity for litigation, perhaps in the Florida Supreme Court or perhaps in federal court," the attorney said, adding a potential lawsuit "has to be more fully evaluated."
"If my research determines there is a significant case, I will make appropriate recommendations to the sheriff," Kuehne said.
The Florida Senate in a 25-15 vote Wednesday declined to reinstate Israel as Broward County sheriff. The senate's decision upheld Executive Order 19-14, the suspension order issued by DeSantis against Israel in January, and disregarded the recommendation of Florida Senate Special Master Dudley Goodlette to reinstate the ex-sheriff. Goodlette, an attorney and former member of the Florida House of Representatives, said DeSantis failed to substantiate his charges of negligence and incompetence against Israel.
The governor's executive order said the responses by the Broward Sheriff's Office to mass shootings at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport and Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, in January 2017 and February 2018 respectively, demonstrated failed leadership on Israel's part.
Kuehne criticized the results of the vote, calling it a "totally political process" and "completely contrary" to the Florida Supreme Court's order regarding the hearing.
"The Florida Supreme Court has made clear that the process of senate review must be based on evidence and cannot be arbitrary," Kuehne said, adding DeSantis' senate allies "decided to change the rules, tilt the playing field and absolve the governor of any obligation under the Constitution to prove the case by evidence."
Israel's case against DeSantis landed before the Florida Senate after both the state's appellate and supreme courts ruled in favor of the governor, authorizing his ability to remove elected officials via decree.
Kuehne said a prospective case before the Florida Supreme Court would challenge what he calls the arbitrary nature of the senate's review process. The attorney cited State ex rel. Hardie v. Coleman, a 1934 Florida Supreme Court ruling that stressed the seriousness of stripping elected officials of their title.
"It says in its text that the process cannot be an arbitrary one; that means it can't be based on whim or conjecture, it has to be based on real evidence," Kuehne said.
Meanwhile, DeSantis thanked the Florida Senate for its decision.
"I felt this needed to be done and the majority in the Senate agreed," he said in a statement. "I hope the outcome provides some measure of relief to the Parkland families that have been doggedly pursuing accountability."
Israel has said he will campaign for the position of Broward County sheriff in the 2020 elections.
Related stories:
Ousted Broward Sheriff Scott Israel Appeals to Florida Senate for Reinstatement
Ex-Broward Sheriff Scott Israel's Reinstatement Recommended by Special Master
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readUS Judge OKs Partial Release of Ex-Special Counsel's Final Report in Election Case
3 minute readSpecial Counsel Jack Smith Prepares Final Report as Trump Opposes Its Release
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250