Centner Academy to Open After Miami Commission Shuts Down Appeal
The City Commission said residents who oppose Centner Academy failed to make their case that the school fails to comply with city zoning code.
October 25, 2019 at 03:14 PM
6 minute read
A controversial $24,000-a-year preschool got the green light to open in Miami after city commissioners shot down opposing neighbors who feared more traffic and carbon monoxide generated from an underground drop-off and pick-up area.
Centner Academy missed its original August opening date after failing to obtain a certificate of occupancy and also being slammed with a challenge by residents of nearby Buena Vista.
Residents appealed a Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board vote June 5 granting a zoning exception allowing the school.
The City Commission on Thursday voted 3-1 to deny residents' appeal and uphold the lower board's vote. Commissioner Joe Carollo was the dissenting vote.
Opponents' attorney David Winker said it wasn't a total loss for his clients, as the commission still imposed requirements based on resident concerns.
The city required studies of CO levels at the underground drop-off and pick-up area and for the fire marshal to inspect the results before renewing the school's annual certificate of use. Also, the school is to put signs directing parent drivers away from residential streets. The city also fixed documents that incorrectly said there will be 195 students to say there will be up to 120.
Center Academy is the brainchild of David Centner, a Miami native who recently came back after a career in the tech field in New York, and his wife, Leila. They have touted an educational approach that prioritizes mindfulness, emotional intelligence and happiness, saying those are the keys to success and not the other way around. There also will be Spanish and Mandarin Chinese classes.
The academy will be at a three-story blue and white building on the southwest corner of North Miami Avenue and Northwest 42nd Street at 4136 N. Miami Ave.
Winker on Thursday tried to convince commissioners the school fails to meet Miami 21 zoning requirements in large part because of CO emissions.
The building originally was supposed to have offices and retail, meaning cars would park in the underground garage. The preschool will use the garage for drop off and pick up, meaning cars will be idling in a largely closed, poorly ventilated area for at least six and a half hours a day, Winker said.
Winker also argued the high tuition shuts out Buena Vista residents from enrolling their children, leaving them to deal with the traffic generated by wealthy parents coming from other areas.
School attorney William Riley Jr. replied the school will enforce a strict traffic plan including mandating parents exit by turning right on North Miami Avenue to prevent them from cutting through the busy street to make a left.
Riley also argued Winker isn't an expert to make his CO emissions case. When Winker tried to read an expert's letter, Riley objected, saying he hasn't seen the testimony.
The Centners have vowed to provide scholarships to half of the 18 students in the first year. Those nine will attend for free, and three of them are from Buena Vista, Riley said.
Commission Chairman Ken Russell said at the meeting that whether the academy is too expensive and unattainable for Buena Vista residents is beyond the commission's scope of review.
Winker made a case for a better pick-up and drop-off area but failed to show how the school zoning exception violates city code, Russell said.
Commissioner Keon Hardemon, who represents the area where the school will open, agreed.
It's the Centners who have the burden to show they comply with the code, Winker replied.
At the meeting, seven people, including the Centners, spoke in favor, and five spoke against the academy.
Opponents also are members of the Buena Vista East Historic Neighborhood Association and Buena Vista Heights Neighborhood Association.
Some opponents said the issue goes beyond meeting the city code, to the way the Centners have done business, often bypassing residents and not communicating with them.
"We have tried working with them to have meetings with us. They have done the opposite," said Rosa Ramos, one of the appellants. "The people who show up to their meetings are people who don't live in the neighborhood."
The school is widely supported by the neighborhood, citing over 80 residents who signed petitions in favor, Leila Centner said at the hearing.
"This isn't about traffic. This is about egos that were bruised because we didn't ask permission the way certain people in the association wanted us to ask," she said.
Centner Academy has been controversial beyond code compliance.
The Centners held an open house without having an occupancy certificate, and opponents received a text from a Connecticut attorney threatening legal action unless they dropped the appeal, Winker said.
The attorney, Wiggin and Dana partner John Doroghazi in New Haven, declined to comment.
"The Centners are used to getting what they want and want to achieve their goals through threats, intimidation and political muscle," Winker told commissioners. "Why did the Centners choose this path rather than community engagement?"
The Centners made accusations of their own at the meeting, saying one of the opponents asked for $3 million to pull out his appeal. Winker and the opponent's mother who also is an appellant denied this.
"One would think it would be a no-brainer that a school promises to uplift humanity that we would have such obstacles," David Centner said. "It's discouraging."
It's unclear when Centner Academy will open, as it's still waiting for a certificate of occupancy, Riley said.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250