Commentary

Attorneys and Publicists: In Times of Crisis, Let's Be Friends Instead of Foes

With both the publicist and the attorney in siloed conversations with the client, he is now receiving the exact opposite advice—don't speak vs. speak fast.

October 28, 2019 at 10:00 AM

4 minute read


 

Julie Talenfeld of BoardRoom PR. Julie Talenfeld of BoardRoom PR.

Historically, publicists and attorneys have not been the closest of comrades. When our clients find themselves in a crisis, lawyers generally instruct them to say very little whereas publicists seek to control the conversation—in content and in stage time. Lawyers might instruct their client to remain silent ("wait for your lawyer!"), whereas a good publicist would prioritize churning out a succinct response quickly, as soon as humanly possible. One can imagine how this puts the client in a sticky situation.

With both the publicist and the attorney in siloed conversations with the client, he is now receiving the exact opposite advice—don't speak vs. speak fast. This adds stress to an already stressful circumstance, and the last thing we both want is a more stressed out client … especially right before a press conference!

Crisis management should always include both the litigation and the communications teams—both pieces are essential to creating a winning strategy. We must come together to ensure our client's best interests; case closed!

Let's Talk

The first problem is that more often than not, the publicist and the lawyer are not in a dialogue with one another. The lack of communication and cohesion here creates a host of problems that take time, energy and resources away from adverting the crisis at hand. Quite simply, we need to talk to one another. Working as a team, together, to develop a crisis communications strategy that is mindful of both legal and reputational risk helps to create a winning game plan for all of us.

Though we often have different instincts and prioritize different concerns, we can pitch our ideas to one another to work through the kinks and cross-check our points of view regarding both possible legal and reputational risk. This will only make our plan of action more bulletproof. Then, and only then, we can come to our client, in unison, with the perfect procedure. Our unity will also give our client a vote of confidence and the assurance that this is, in fact, the best plan.

Our Priorities Are Not Mutually Exclusive

While I understand the instinct to instruct a client to say as little as possible, there are many responses that can be said that usually offer little to zero litigation risk. For example, a client may offer condolences and apologies for an accident caused by his company without taking responsibility for it. We can work in tandem to ensure that this significant difference is understood by our client and translated into his statement to the press.

As a publicist, I will always encourage my client to get out in front of a crisis, and to face it with as much dignity and grace as possible. Often, they will feel more comfortable to do so with the blessing of their legal counsel. I encourage my publicists at BoardroomPR to involve their client's legal team through each stage of developing and implementing strategy so that everyone is on the same page.

Lawyers do a disservice to their clients when they don't at least consider proactive communication with the press and the public. When a client hides, they become suspicious. And when a client hides behind their lawyer, they appear compromised.

Teamwork Makes the Dream Work

Attorneys and publicists have much to offer one another. Like any healthy relationship, when we challenge one another we both come out stronger, and our businesses will benefit in turn.  Let's be friends and help ourselves, each other and our clients. It's a win-win-win.

Julie Talenfeld is the president of BoardroomPR, one of Florida's largest integrated marketing agencies. She can be reached at [email protected].

 

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Go To Lexis →

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Go To Bloomberg Law →

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

NOT FOR REPRINT

Latest
Trending

Who Got The Work

J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.

Read More

Who Got The Work

Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Read More

Law.com Pro

    More from ALM