Fed Interest Rate Cuts Won't Drive New Construction, But Still Good News
Lower rates are more likely to prompt real estate refinancing of existing projects as opposed to new construction, experts say.
October 28, 2019 at 05:00 AM
5 minute read
The Federal Reserve's two interest rate cuts this year generally bode well for the real estate market, although it doesn't necessarily feed more construction.
The Fed lowered the benchmark interest rate in July for the first time since the Great Recession a decade ago and then again in September. Each decrease was 25 basis point, or a quarter percentage point to lower the Fed fund rate at 1.75%-2%.
A third cut is expected as early as this week with the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee meeting Tuesday and Wednesday.
The Fed fund rate is the bank-borrowing rate and, if banks borrow at lower rates, they can lend at lower rates.
Developers and home buyers generally can take out cheaper loans and borrow more when they're paying less in interest, developer Noah Breakstone noted.
"Typically, when interest rates are lower, there's an incentive to make that investment even for developers, real estate, manufacturing, anything in the business world," said Breakstone, CEO and managing partner at investment and development firm BTI Partners LLC in Fort Lauderdale. "The cost of borrowing is less."
BTI Partners has been in the market to finance a new multifamily project in South Florida and a new condominium community in Central Florida, Breakstone said. He declined to identify the projects with negotiations under way.
"We are seeing a direct relationship in the lowering of the Fed rate to the lowering of the cost of borrowing. We would look to borrow at close to 6.5% maybe six or eight months ago," Breakstone said. "We are seeing the same opportunities that we can borrow for development and construction at probably 5.75%. Maybe we are seeing half a point to three-quarters reduction. Usually there's a direct relationship with that."
The lower borrowing cost likely won't prompt more commercial construction in the busy South Florida market.
Instead, expect more refinancings of existing real estate, said Peter Mekras, president of Aztec Group Inc., a Miami real estate capital markets intermediary and merchant bank.
New construction is driven more by fundamentals such as demand and rents, but current owners of existing property generally want to secure lower interest rates by refinancing projects, he said.
Aztec is working to refinance a new apartment tower in Miami's Central Business District and a Lakeland shopping center, Mekras said, without identifying the developments.
If owners "previously could only borrow say $80 or $90 (million), they may be able to borrow $100. I am just using that as relative term. Meaning they can get more in loan proceeds because at the lower cost of interest, the amount of income coverage they have over the cost of the loan allows them to get a greater loan amount," he said. "This move is surely a positive for the borrowing and buying community at large."
Breakstone noted the new development costs won't be lower in spite of the lower interest rates because of recent increases in construction and labor costs.
"The cost of materials has increased, so it almost offsets the reduction of the added value of lower interest rates and having more affordable products," he said. "There's a number of elements that helps create affordability."
One group that would see more affordability is individual home buyers, who essentially can take out bigger loans because of lower rates.
"I want to buy $300,000 home and put 10% down and am left with a $270,000 mortgage. At 5% interest, the mortgage would be about $1,100 a month," Breakstone said in a hypothetical scenario. "If interest rates were instead 3.5%, you can afford $340,000 and get the same $1,100 payment."
This year's rate cuts were factored in the trade war with China, weakness in U.S. manufacturing and a global economic slowdown. The thinking is that lower rates would encourage consumer borrowing and spending to boost economic growth.
Investors are more likely to take money out of the bank, where they are earning low interest, and put the money into real estate or other opportunities, Breakstone said.
"You may contemplate investing in the stock market or in a real estate opportunity, looking to make more money than the money just sitting there," he said. "When rates are lowered, investment is encouraged. Whether you buy housing or you invest in equipment or new real estate opportunities, the cost of borrowing is less because interest rates are less."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250