Miami's Brickell Flatiron High-Rise Condo Gets Occupancy OK
The 736-foot building is now the tallest condominium tower south of New York.
November 01, 2019 at 11:07 AM
2 minute read
Expect a deluge of closings in the coming weeks at Miami's new Brickell Flatiron, which at 736 feet high is the tallest condominium south of New York.
The tower, reminiscent of New York's Flatiron building for its flattened design, obtained its temporary certificate of occupancy Wednesday, allowing unit sales to close. About 95% of the 527 units are under contract.
Pioneer Miami developer Ugo Colombo developed Brickell Flatiron through his CMC Group LLC.
The 64-story tower reached a record as the tallest condo tower only, not the tallest residential building south of New York. That record is held by the nearby 868-foot Panorama Tower, a mixed-use building with apartments, a 208-room Hyatt Centric boutique hotel, 106,000 square feet of office space, 48,000 square feet of high-end retail and a 2,039-space parking garage.
Undoubtedly, developers in downtown Miami and the Brickell Financial District are reaching new heights. Developer Bekir Okan is planning the condo-hotel Okan tower at 555 N. Miami Ave., which at 890 feet would be taller than Panorama Tower.
Brickell Flatiron is at 1001 S. Miami Ave. in the heart of booming Brickell district, which boasts heavy foot traffic fed largely by the mixed-use Brickell City Centre and Mary Brickell Village.
Over half of the Brickell Flatiron buyers in the Luis Revuelta-designed building are from the U.S. and the rest hail from Mexico, Argentina, Italy, Venezuela and Colombia, according to a news release.
The remaining residences are offered for $650,000 to $3 million, and a duplex penthouse is listed at $8 million.
Amenities include a spa, pool, gym with panoramic views of Biscayne Bay and downtown Miami, steam and sauna rooms, lockers, Pilates and yoga studios, movie theater, wine cellar, valet and electric-car charging stations.
The tower has 24,800 square feet of ground-floor retail and restaurant space. CMC Group sold that real estate to Elysee Investments, led by Avi Dishi of New York and Haim Yehezkel of Miami.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250