Attorneys Spar Over Production of Dershowitz-Boies Audio Recording With Epstein Ties
Former Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz has provided a recording of a call with David Boies to a federal judge but doesn't want it subjected to forensic analysis.
November 04, 2019 at 03:05 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Former Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz is trying to block a Jeffrey Epstein accuser's attempt to analyze an audio recording of a call with David Boies, which could prove central to a contentious defamation case playing out in federal court.
Dershowitz's attorneys called the request to produce the analogue tape to third-party forensic firms a "wholly premature, if not improper" bid to access its contents ahead of discovery.
The microcassette recording allegedly includes a 2015 phone conversation between Dershowitz and Boies, who until recently represented Virginia Giuffre in her defamation lawsuit against the retired professor.
Dershowitz maintains Boies, chairman of Boies Schiller Flexner, disparaged his own client's case on the call and expressed doubts about Giuffre's claims that she was trafficked by the late financier and forced to have sex with Dershowitz and other powerful men.
Many more women claimed they were trafficked by Epstein at his Palm Beach estate, in his Manhattan home and on his private Caribbean island after the #MeToo movement spread amid Hollywood scandals two years ago.
Dershowitz, who has repeatedly and forcefully denied sexual allegations tied to Epstein, made the substance of the conversation a key part of his defamation defense in the case, claiming Giuffre conspired with former attorneys to extort him with false allegations of forced sex.
U.S. District Judge Loretta A. Preska of the Southern District of New York last month ordered Dershowitz to provide forensic firm Stroz Friedberg with a digital recording of the call to make a copy for both sides.
Dershowitz turned over a microcassette, which is believed to hold the original audio of the conversation. No content from the tape have been made publicly available.
In a Nov. 1 letter, Giuffre's new attorney, Chuck Cooper, said the digital recording was only a "partial recording" with chunks of "either incomprehensible or wholly inaudible" dialogue. The poor quality, he argued, raised "grave concerns" about the accuracy of a sealed transcript that Dershowitz previously provided to the court.
"Many of the words Mr. Dershowitz records in these transcripts simply cannot be discerned with any degree of confidence on the recording he provided," said Cooper, a conservative legal luminary and chairman of the Washington law firm Cooper & Kirk.
As a result, Cooper said "expert analysis of the microcassette is imperative" to determine the true contents of the conversation. But he said Stroz Friedberg lacked the ability to analyze analogue storage devices or extract the audio they hold and asked Preska for an order requiring Stroz to send the tape to forensic firms with the required sound capabilities.
On Monday, an attorney for Dershowitz said the request was simply a stab at "unilateral pre-answer discovery" and countered the microcassette should be returned to the defense.
"Plaintiff's contentions as to accuracy and audibility of the recording are issues for trial or to be explored during discovery," Aidala Bertuna & Kamins attorney Imran H. Ansari wrote in a two-page letter. "If and when Mr. Dershowitz seeks to admit the tape into evidence, it will be his burden to establish authenticity and audibility, and arguably, if he did not to seek its admission, further forensics would not be needed."
Ansari also raised concerns about potential damage to the tape if it was transferred "between multiple third parties."
The conversation has played an important role in the lawsuit, which accuses Dershowitz of defaming Giuffre in a series of public statements calling her a perjurer and a prostitute.
Dershowitz said he planned to call Boies and partner Sigrid McCawley as trial witnesses. And last month, Dershowitz succeeded in having Boies Schiller disqualified under the witness-advocate rule, which bars attorneys from participating in cases where other lawyers in their firm might be called as witnesses.
Giuffre hired Cooper to take over the case last week on Boies' recommendation. Boies and McCawley, longtime attorneys for Giuffre, both intend to continue to represent her in other matters.
In an interview, Boies disputed Dershowitz's characterization of their phone call and said the former professor was using only snippets of the recording to take the discussion out of context. He challenged Dershowitz and his team instead to make the full contents public and "let people decide for themselves" what actually was said.
"If Alan Dershowitz had a tape that was helpful to him, he would have made it public by now," he said.
Dershowitz was not available for comment by deadline, and Cooper did not return a call seeking comment on the latest court filings.
Epstein died by suicide Aug. 10 at a New York federal jail, but relatives are disputing the medical examiner's conclusion, pointing to homicide as a possibility. He was detained on sex-trafficking charges after avoiding federal prosecution in Florida in exchange for a Palm Beach County plea deal allowing him to stay out of jail for much of a lenient sentence.
The defamation case is Giuffre v. Dershowitz.
Read More:
Boies Replaced as Attorney for Epstein Accuser in Defamation Lawsuit Against Dershowitz
Boies Schiller Attorneys Disqualified in Dershowitz Defamation Case
Alan Dershowitz's Lawyers Urge Dismissal of Epstein Accuser's Defamation Suit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Attorneys Awarded $113K on $1 Judgment in Noise Ordinance Dispute
4 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250