Alan Dershowitz Sues Epstein Accuser for Defamation, Emotional Distress
A counterclaim was filed in litigation begun by a woman who claims former Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz tried to damage her credibility by calling her, among other things, a "serial liar" and "prostitute."
November 07, 2019 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Fighting back against a defamation lawsuit, Alan Dershowitz filed one of his own against a Jeffrey Epstein accuser who claims she was forced to have sex with the former Harvard law professor.
The counterclaim filed Thursday in New York federal court lists counts of defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Virginia Giuffre, one of the first women to publicly accuse Epstein of sex trafficking.
Giuffre's suit filed in April claimed Dershowitz aimed to damage her credibility with news media by calling her, among other things, a "serial liar" and "prostitute."
Dershowitz, who has repeatedly denied having sexual contact with Giuffre, has long maintained her suit was an extortion plot, and he made clear in recent weeks that he planned to seek damages.
Dershowitz's counterclaim said the allegations were part of a "broader conspiracy" between Giuffre and her lawyers to "subvert the judicial process" to drum up private settlements from other wealthier individuals associated with Epstein, the late Palm Beach financier who died by suicide in a New York jail little more than a month after he was indicted on federal sex-trafficking charges.
"Her lies concerning Dershowitz have caused tremendous damage to his personal and professional reputation, his business, his health and caused him emotional and physical pain and suffering. Through these counterclaims, he seeks to hold her accountable for that damage," his attorneys, Howard Cooper of Boston-based Todd & Weld and Imran Ansari of New York-based Aidala Bertuna & Kamins, wrote in the 37-page submission.
Chuck Cooper of Washington-based Cooper & Kirk, who represents Giuffre, did not return a call for comment by deadline.
A Manhattan federal judge last month allowed Giuffre to proceed with her suit against Dershowitz but disqualified her longtime attorneys from Boies Schiller Flexner based on Dershowitz's plans to call firm chairman David Boies and Fort Lauderdale partner Sigrid McCawley to testify at trial.
Their continued representation would violate the witness-advocate rule, which bars attorneys from participating in cases where other lawyers from their firm might be called as witnesses, U.S. District Judge Loretta A. Preska of the Southern District of New York ruled.
Boies and McCawley say they will continue to represent Giuffre in other matters.
Both sides are due in court Nov. 13 for a case conference before Preska.
Epstein died by suicide Aug. 10 at a New York federal jail, but relatives are disputing the medical examiner's conclusion, pointing to homicide as a possibility. He was detained on sex-trafficking charges after avoiding federal prosecution in Florida in exchange for a Palm Beach County plea deal in 2008 allowing him to stay out of jail for much of a lenient sentence.
The Miami Herald published a series last year detailing allegations about Epstein that included dozens of women and specific allegations leveled against Dershowitz by Giuffre, one of the first women to comer forward against Epstein.
This year's indictment charged Epstein as a serial sex trafficker of "dozens of minor girls" at his mansions in Palm Beach and New York.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 2Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 3Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 4Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
- 5In Lawsuit, Ex-Google Employee Says Company’s Layoffs Targeted Parents and Others on Leave
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250