'Narcos' Copyright Lawsuit by Colombian Journalist Fails
Comparing a memoir and episodes in the first season, a Miami federal judge ruled the series relied on nonprotectable historical facts.
November 12, 2019 at 02:52 PM
3 minute read
A Miami judge dropped a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a Colombian media personality claiming Netflix's "Narcos" series improperly borrowed details from her memoir about her affair and other dealings with Medellin cartel kingpin Pablo Escobar.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Smith granted summary judgment for the defendants, concluding similarities in two scenes cited by Virginia Vallejo were nonprotectable facts, expression and themes.
"Themes of power and manipulation would be expected in any work about a ruthless criminal who rises to become one of the richest men in the world, as would themes of men who are both good and evil, which can be found throughout literature," Smith wrote Friday.
Louis P. Petrich of Ballard Spahr in Los Angeles and Holland & Knight attorneys Scott Ponce and Rebecca J. Cañamero, who represented the defendants, had no comment on the order.
Vallejo's attorney, Robert Thornburg of Allen Dyer Doppelt + Gilchrist, plans an appeal, saying the judge didn't draw a proper distinction between nonprotectable historical fact and protectable nonhistorical fact.
"Both sides fully anticipated that this would ultimately be decided by the Eleventh Circuit," he said.
Smith's analysis focused on the portrayals of a sex scene between Escobar and fictional TV journalist Valeria Velez and a real-life meeting of Escobar, Colombian M-19 guerrilla leader Ivan Marina Ospina and Vallejo in her book "Loving Pablo, Hating Escobar."
Escobar gave his first television interview to Vellejo in 1983.
In the sex scene, Escobar caressed a blindfolded television reporter's neck and chest with a revolver. For the meeting, Vallejo's chapter title "That Palace in Flames" becomes "The Palace in Flames" in the series. But a different woman appears in the "Narcos" scene where Escobar plots to have evidence against him disappear during a guerrilla raid on the Colombian Palace of Justice in 1985.
Vallejo maintained "the 'average lay observer' would recognize the two scenes as having been copied from her copyright protected work," the judge said in a summary of her position. "Comparing the two scenes leads to the conclusion that they are not substantially similar. The atmosphere, or overall feel, of each of the scenes is very different."
The defendants were Netflix, series producer Narcos Productions LLC and distributor Gaumont Television USA LLC. The disputed episodes appeared in the first season of the three-season series.
Smith, who joined the bench in June, inherited the copyright case from U.S. District Chief Judge K. Michael Moore, who rejected a defense dismissal motion in May.
The U.S. government flew Vallejo out of Colombia in 2006 to testify in several high-profile cases involving figures connected to cocaine cartels. She received political asylum in the United States in 2010.
Penelope Cruz played Vallejo in the 2017 movie "Loving Pablo" based on her book opposite Javier Bardem as Escobar.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250