'Narcos' Copyright Lawsuit by Colombian Journalist Fails
Comparing a memoir and episodes in the first season, a Miami federal judge ruled the series relied on nonprotectable historical facts.
November 12, 2019 at 02:52 PM
3 minute read
A Miami judge dropped a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a Colombian media personality claiming Netflix's "Narcos" series improperly borrowed details from her memoir about her affair and other dealings with Medellin cartel kingpin Pablo Escobar.
U.S. District Judge Rodney Smith granted summary judgment for the defendants, concluding similarities in two scenes cited by Virginia Vallejo were nonprotectable facts, expression and themes.
"Themes of power and manipulation would be expected in any work about a ruthless criminal who rises to become one of the richest men in the world, as would themes of men who are both good and evil, which can be found throughout literature," Smith wrote Friday.
Louis P. Petrich of Ballard Spahr in Los Angeles and Holland & Knight attorneys Scott Ponce and Rebecca J. Cañamero, who represented the defendants, had no comment on the order.
Vallejo's attorney, Robert Thornburg of Allen Dyer Doppelt + Gilchrist, plans an appeal, saying the judge didn't draw a proper distinction between nonprotectable historical fact and protectable nonhistorical fact.
"Both sides fully anticipated that this would ultimately be decided by the Eleventh Circuit," he said.
Smith's analysis focused on the portrayals of a sex scene between Escobar and fictional TV journalist Valeria Velez and a real-life meeting of Escobar, Colombian M-19 guerrilla leader Ivan Marina Ospina and Vallejo in her book "Loving Pablo, Hating Escobar."
Escobar gave his first television interview to Vellejo in 1983.
In the sex scene, Escobar caressed a blindfolded television reporter's neck and chest with a revolver. For the meeting, Vallejo's chapter title "That Palace in Flames" becomes "The Palace in Flames" in the series. But a different woman appears in the "Narcos" scene where Escobar plots to have evidence against him disappear during a guerrilla raid on the Colombian Palace of Justice in 1985.
Vallejo maintained "the 'average lay observer' would recognize the two scenes as having been copied from her copyright protected work," the judge said in a summary of her position. "Comparing the two scenes leads to the conclusion that they are not substantially similar. The atmosphere, or overall feel, of each of the scenes is very different."
The defendants were Netflix, series producer Narcos Productions LLC and distributor Gaumont Television USA LLC. The disputed episodes appeared in the first season of the three-season series.
Smith, who joined the bench in June, inherited the copyright case from U.S. District Chief Judge K. Michael Moore, who rejected a defense dismissal motion in May.
The U.S. government flew Vallejo out of Colombia in 2006 to testify in several high-profile cases involving figures connected to cocaine cartels. She received political asylum in the United States in 2010.
Penelope Cruz played Vallejo in the 2017 movie "Loving Pablo" based on her book opposite Javier Bardem as Escobar.
Read more:
Miami Judge Allows Journalist's 'Narcos' Lawsuit to Survive
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWinston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
2 minute readMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 2Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 3Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
- 4Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
- 5How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250