Publicly Traded Home Investors Get Reprieve From FinCEN Disclosure Rule
Publicly traded companies capitalized on low single-family home prices after the Great Recession by scooping up large portfolios of distressed properties.
November 18, 2019 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Publicly traded companies got a break from a federal mandate to reveal the names of people behind companies making big cash home purchases in major metropolitan areas such as New York and Miami.
The U.S. Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network exempted publicly traded companies from disclosure requirements imposed in 2016, although private companies still must comply.
FinCEN requires title insurance companies to report the names of people who control shell companies buying residential properties in a push to limit money laundering through the sale of high-end single-family homes and condominium units.
The disclosure rule covers companies paying $300,000 or more in cash for homes. Beyond Miami and New York, the geographic targeting order applies to Boston, Chicago, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle and parts of Texas.
FinCEN extended the GTO for six months Nov. 8 while adding the publicly traded companies exemption.
The exemption should be good news for listed companies, which already are required to submit extensive disclosures to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
"I guess the folks at FinCEN think the publicly traded companies are known entities and therefore they can be followed," said Christopher Zoller, a broker-associate at EWM in Coral Gables.
The focus of the money laundering enforcement is limited liability companies that often are impossible to trace to individual owners. Many register in Delaware for its lax identification and public disclosure requirements for LLCs.
"Let's say you have a Delaware corporation that owns a Florida corporation that owns a corporation in the British Virgin Islands, which is owned by a corporation in Panama," Zoller said. "It's going to take you a long time to find out whose money is behind all this."
Many affluent buyers comply with the disclosures but still opt to buy homes through LLCs for security and privacy reasons, Zoller added.
Public Companies
Several publicly traded companies became big players in the single-family home market after the housing crash when they bought distressed homes at deep discounts in foreclosure and rented them out.
Areas in south Miami-Dade County, including Homestead, which were particularly hard hit by the foreclosure crisis, saw heavy transaction volume, Miami attorney Anthony De Yurre said.
Now that home values have rebounded, publicly traded companies are still in the business but growing mainly through mergers and acquisitions or by buying other companies' home portfolios, added De Yurre, a Bilzin Sumberg partner. The exemption for public companies could mean savings for them.
The public companies can cut costs with "less regulation and less legal hoops to jump through, and this could be seen as one of the things that could allow them to operate through efficiency and less legal framework," he said. "Doing that exercise for 20,000 [homes] if it was done on a cash basis, you could extrapolate the level of transaction cost that could be added."
One of the biggest publicly traded players in the housing market is Invitation Homes Inc., which has a portfolio of over 80,000 homes in 17 markets. It was created after the merger of the rental divisions of New York-based Blackstone Group Inc. and Starwood Capital.
Blackstone took Invitation Homes public in 2017 and sold over $1 billion in shares this year, according to a Housing Wire report.
Other big industry names are American Homes 4 Rent, a real estate investment trust based in Agoura Hills, California, and Front Yard Residential, another REIT based in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
Publicly traded companies tend to opt for single-family homes rather than condo units.
"The majority of the clients that I have that do this were buying single-family homes instead of having to deal with a condo association, and the condo association may have had an extra layer of fees and costs," De Yurre said.
Exemption Impact
Attorney Diane Nobile in Miami said the new exemption won't endanger the GTO's goals.
"If it was an exemption of the GTO, there had to be good reason for that," said Nobile, a partner at Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr. "There would be no reason to extend the GTO and make exemptions if it wasn't serving the overarching goal of the GTO."
She sees the potential for abuse by public companies "as too remote of a possibility."
The South Florida GTO had a "slight chilling effect" on cash deals but did not have a direct impact on Nobile's work, she added.
FinCEN originally imposed the disclosure requirement for cash deals over $1 million in Miami-Dade County and over $3 million in Manhattan but later lowered the dollar threshold to $300,000.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250