Here Comes the Suit: The Beatles Allege Trademark Infringement in Florida
Help! They need somebody. Not just anybody: Former members of The Beatles and their successors have hired Fort Lauderdale lawyers to sue over alleged trademark infringement.
November 20, 2019 at 12:50 PM
3 minute read
A London company owned by former members of English rock band The Beatles and their successors has lawyered up in South Florida. They're gearing to fight a group of defendants who have allegedly earned substantial profits by selling products featuring trademarked phrases "The Beatles," "Beatles" and "Yellow Submarine."
Plaintiff Apple Corps Ltd. is owned by Ringo Starr, Paul McCartney and the estates of John Lennon and George Harrison. It was founded in 1968 as a business venture that combined music, films, fashion and electronics, and now continues to hold licensing rights for the band's brand and music.
A second plaintiff, Subafilms Ltd., is an affiliated film production company that owns the rights to "Yellow Submarine," a cartoon film made in 1967.
Apple Corps has also butted heads with tech giant Apple Inc. over trademark infringement in what became a long and winding road of lawsuits spanning 30 years and resulting in a string of settlement agreements.
The defendants in this case, described as "individuals, partnerships and unincorporated associations," are accused of trademark, counterfeiting and infringement, false designation of origin, common law unfair competition and common law trademark infringement.
The lawsuit alleges they have duped and confused Floridians by selling counterfeit goods that are similar to those available at The Beatles Store, using domain names and seller IDs established with false or misleading information.
The defendants remained anonymous as of press time. Plaintiff attorneys Stephen M. Gaffigan, Virgilio Gigante and T. Raquel Wiborg-Rodriguez of Stephen M. Gaffigan in Fort Lauderdale have asked the court to file their names under seal to prevent them from "prematurely receiving notice" of the plaintiff's investigation "into the operation of their illegal businesses."
"In light of the illicit nature of the counterfeiting business and the ability of counterfeiters to practically eliminate their evidentiary trails by conducting their business entirely over the internet, plaintiffs have good reason to believe that providing advance notification of plaintiffs' claims would cause defendants to hide or transfer their ill-gotten assets, inventory and related records beyond the jurisdiction of this court and thereby thwart the court's ability to grant meaningful relief," the plaintiffs motion said.
Gaffigan, Gigante and Wiborg-Rodriguez did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The lawsuit says Apple Corps registered "The Beatles" trademark for watches, headwear, sweatshirts, T-shirts and shirts in February 1993, and registered "Beatles" for use on more than 150 other types of products, including jewelry, bags, stationery and homeware in July 2013. Subafilms claims it registered "Yellow Submarine" in November 2007 for use on household linen, bedspreads, sheets, pillow cases and towels.
The Beatles appear unwilling to "let it be" in this instance, instead seeking an injunction, damages, profits, attorney fees and costs.
U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in the Southern District of Florida will preside over the litigation.
|Read the complaint:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
O'Melveny Secures Global Clearances for Korean Air-Asiana Merger
Orlando Man's Fake Political Fundraising Websites Stole Donations, Feds Say
Ice Miller Debuts New Miami Office After Landing Two Greenspoon Marder Attorneys
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Beyond the Courtroom: Protecting High-Profile Clients From Online Smear Campaigns and Cyber Threats
- 2SAG-AFTRA Union Health Plan Slammed With Data Breach Class Actions in Wake of Phishing Attack
- 3Memorable Concurrences of the 20th Century
- 4Tips From—and About—the New Judges on the Northern District of California Bench
- 5As Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250