Monty's Miami Beach Restaurant, Landlord in Legal Battle Over Lease
Landlord Miami Beach Marina Associates says Monty's owes rent and has racked up health code violations. Monty's says the allegations are false and part of a campaign to eject the South Beach restaurant from a long-term agreement.
November 25, 2019 at 03:44 PM
5 minute read
On any given night, Monty's Sunset restaurant and bar is serving hot chicken wings, shrimp and overflowing cocktails to thumping live bands, but its Miami Beach landlord is no fan.
Miami Beach Marina Associates Ltd. wants Monty's out of its South Beach marina, saying the restaurant owes back rent, has racked up hundreds of health code violations and has done nothing to improve its menu and image to keep up with competitors.
Monty's attorney Craig Shapiro maintains the marina is trying to bully Monty's into leaving, saying the landlord assumed the lease last year without knowing the eatery has over 33 years left on its agreement.
Dallas-based Suntex Marinas is a marina owner and operator that leases the South Beach marina at 300 Alton Road from the city under the name Miami Beach Marina Associates. When it assumed the city lease, it inherited onsite subleases including Monty's.
The marina offers expansive views of Biscayne Bay and the Miami skyline and is popular with joggers, dog walkers and bicyclists.
Miami Beach Marina Associates represented by Catherine Rodriguez, a founding partner at Filler Rodriguez in Miami Beach, sued Monty's on Nov. 13 in a five-count Miami-Dade Circuit Court complaint asking the court to remove the restaurant.
Sunntex responded to an inquiry emailed to Rodriguez.
"Although, we regret the situation we are in, we have found that over the years Monty's has not lived up to the high standards of our marina, the surrounding community or the state," Suntex said by email.
In its complaint, Suntex argues Monty's is trying to shortchange Suntex on rent, which is a fixed amount plus a percentage of gross sales.
Monty's owes $656,155 in rent under a Suntex rent increase allowed each time Monty's exercises an extension option, according to the complaint. A leasing agent hired by Suntex determined the new rent should be just over $1 million a year and 10% of gross sales.
In addition, Suntex objects to Monty's expert, saying a leasing agent and not an appraiser is required under the lease.
Suntex also finds fault with Monty's menu and decor. Its contention is that if Monty's isn't operating at its best and is cutting prices, it's shortchanging its landlord by generating less in gross sales.
The lawsuit lists counts of breach of contract and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing and seeks declaratory relief. The landlord listed two removal counts, one for nonpayment of rent and one for failing to cure a lease breach other than nonpayment of rent.
Shapiro calls Suntex's claims "manufactured."
"One of the principals originally indicated to Monty's when they bought the marina from the Christophs that they were looking to take over Monty's and when the amounts they had indicated they would be willing to purchase it for were paltry, then they made some other intimations to take over the lease," said Shapiro, of counsel at Buchbinder & Elegant in Miami. "To me this is all just a ruse to bully and intimidate and unlawfully malign the quality of Monty's."
The Christophs is a reference to Robert Christoph and relatives who previously leased the marina.
David Filler is of counsel at Filler Rodriguez, which filed the lawsuit, and his LinkedIn page lists him as principal at Suntex Marina Investors LLC.
Shapiro said Monty's current lease runs through 2021, but the Christophs approved extensions that allow it to stay in place for 33 years afterward. Filler didn't know about the extension until after Suntex assumed the lease, Shapiro said.
He said he plans to file a response and counterclaim in the coming weeks.
Suntex refuted Shapiro's claims saying it tried for nearly a year to resolve the alleged issues at the restaurant.
This "belies Mr. Shapiro's comments," Suntex said in an email.
Health Code
One of the biggest points of contention is over health code violations.
Suntex alleges Monty's has had 300 health code violations since 2013, including a confirmed food poisoning complaint, and has been fined by the state.
The suit details a scene where meat, seafood and dairy products are stored in "dangerously" high temperatures. Other allegations are that the restaurant doesn't do proper parasite destruction for seafood served as sushi and ceviche, and black and green mold-like substances accumulated on soda guns and drink nozzles.
"The repeated and consistent nature of many of Monty's health violations indicates that Monty's is failing to take adequate measure to comply with health and sanitation rules," Suntex said in its statement.
The alleged code violations are untrue, Shapiro countered. "Over the years, and certainly not unlike any restaurant, there have been a few inconsequential topics raised and immediately corrected on site upon which the matter was closed without incident," Shapiro said.
The Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation's website shows a foodborne illness inspection was done in April 2018 with the phrase "allegation confirmed" appearing next to the listing. No additional information was provided except the case was marked as closed.
There also was an administrative complaint in 2015, but the state marked it as "conditions satisfied," and other listings show the restaurant met inspection standards.
Shapiro vehemently denied the allegation that Monty's has been fined, saying it always passed inspections.
"In fact, the inspector has always commented about how Monty's Sunset's kitchen is among the best on the beach," Shapiro said. "The new landlord's claims are nothing more than spurious and manufactured claims and a ruse to bully and intimidate in an effort to unlawfully take over Monty's extremely long term lease."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1Robinson & Cole Adds to Immigration Team in Philly
- 2DC Circuit Revives Firefighters' Religious Freedom Litigation in Facial Hair Policy Row
- 3‘High Demand’: Former Trump Admin Lawyers Leverage Connections for Big Law Work, Jobs
- 4Considerations for Establishing or Denying a Texas Partnership to Invest in Real Estate
- 5In-House AI Adoption Stalls Despite Rising Business Pressures
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250