Lawsuit Targets Corrections Dept. Treatment of Disabled Prisoners
Disability Rights Florida Inc. is accusing the Florida Department of Corrections of failing to comply with a settlement about discrimination against inmates who are deaf, blind or use wheelchairs.
December 05, 2019 at 01:59 PM
6 minute read
A group representing prisoners with disabilities is accusing the Florida Department of Corrections of failing to comply with a settlement reached in a federal lawsuit about discrimination against inmates who are deaf, blind or use wheelchairs.
Under the settlement finalized in June 2017, the state agreed, among other things, to provide sign-language interpreters for deaf prisoners and to remove architectural barriers for inmates who use wheelchairs.
But two years after a federal judge signed off on the settlement, Disability Rights Florida Inc. is back in court suing the prisons agency for breach of contract over the agreement, which forced the state to comply with laws protecting disabled people.
"Florida prisoners with physical disabilities are still suffering from the lack of accommodations, aid and services and are still being excluded from FDC [Florida Department of Corrections] programs, services and activities because of their disabilities," attorneys representing the group wrote in the lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Leon County circuit court.
Disability Rights Florida, a federally funded agency, is being represented by the Morgan & Morgan law firm and the Florida Justice Institute, which represented the organization in the original challenge.
The initial lawsuit, filed in 2016, detailed issues involving more than two-dozen inmates who were deaf, blind or needed wheelchairs or prosthetic devices but who were repeatedly denied services or assistance and were threatened with retaliation for complaining. Some inmates were also excluded from jobs because of their disabilities, according to the complaint.
Since the settlement, the nonprofit Disability Rights Florida and its lawyers "have been diligently monitoring" the corrections department's compliance with the settlement by interviewing prisoners, reviewing records and attending meetings with agency staff members, according to the new lawsuit.
The monitoring efforts "have uncovered serious violations of the agreement," and Disability Rights Florida, "consistently communicated the nature of these violations … and has repeatedly requested FDC to come into compliance," the group's lawyers wrote.
"Yet FDC has failed to do so. After over two years of these discussions, DRF (Disability Rights Florida) has been left with no choice but to bring this lawsuit in order to bring FDC into compliance," the lawyers wrote in the 34-page complaint.
Disability Rights Florida notified the corrections agency in February that the state was out of compliance with the settlement, according to the lawsuit. The notice "contained sufficient detail" for corrections officials to investigate the problems and rectify them, the lawsuit said.
Department of Corrections spokeswoman Michelle Glady said Wednesday the agency had not been served with the lawsuit. But she said the department "has been working collaboratively with Disability Rights Florida over the last three years to ensure compliance with the identified ADA [Americans with Disabilities Act] issues at our facilities."
The agency "sent a proposed corrective action plan to address DRFs [Disability Rights Florida's] concerns and will continue to make the necessary improvements agreed to," Glady added
The alleged breaches of the settlement include failing to provide qualified interpreters and hearing aids for deaf and hard-of-hearing inmates; failing to make architectural modifications to prisons to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act; and confiscating or failing to provide wheelchairs, canes, walkers or other devices for prisoners who have mobility impairments.
Among other issues, it alleges the department failed to provide interpreters at some prisons for deaf prisoners attending education programs, substance abuse programs, work and job training and religious services.
In addition, "no interpreters were provided at all for intake and orientation services" at the corrections department's five reception centers in 2019, the lawyers wrote, labeling the failure a "significant breach" of the agreement.
"Interpreters are a critical accommodation at reception centers. The reception center is the first facility a prisoner is sent to as they enter the state prison system, and it is there where they undergo comprehensive screening, along with possible medical care," the lawyers wrote. At least 13 prisoners who needed American Sign Language interpreters were processed without being evaluated by a qualified interpreter, according to the lawsuit.
"FDC's failure to provide interpreters is systemic and widespread and not limited to isolated incidents," the lawsuit alleges.
The disability-rights group and corrections officials met on May 20 to discuss the alleged breaches of the settlement but "did not reach an agreement on how to resolve the various violations," according to the lawsuit.
On Oct. 11, after several written exchanges, the prisons agency provided a response in which it proposed corrective actions for the deficiencies.
But the agency's plan only proposed action on seven of the 19 items presented by Disability Rights Florida, according to the lawsuit.
"The corrective action proposed by FDC is inadequate to address the scope of the continued breach of the agreement in each of those areas," the organization's lawyers wrote.
The lawsuit also accuses corrections officials of coding at least 30 prisoners as having lesser impairments than they should have, "resulting in them being denied accommodations," which amounts to another significant breach of the agreement, the lawsuit alleges.
As a result of being improperly coded or taken off a list of impaired inmates, prisoners have been denied placement in dorms that have accommodations for people with disabilities and have been denied wheelchairs, canes, walkers, braces, glasses, magnifiers, talking books and other items, the lawsuit alleges.
Some deaf prisoners who had been using hearing aids for years before the agreement went into effect were improperly coded as having a lesser impairment "and have subsequently been denied hearing aids," the group's lawyers wrote.
The lawsuit also accuses the department of improperly denying prisoners with disabilities access to work, vocational and educational programs.
Most prisoners with physical disabilities "have been assigned to be 'housemen' rather than being given other, more desirable and stimulating job assignments without assessing where reasonable modifications could be made. The responsibilities of 'housemen' generally involve cleaning the dormitory," the lawsuit said.
Dara Kam reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami Firm Reaches $1.9M Settlement for Protester's Injuries, Pursues Class Action for Others
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250