K&L Gates Associates Win First Trial in Challenge to Florida Prison Policy
Attorneys for a Florida prison inmate argued the state's policy on beards violated federal religious protections.
December 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
PRO BONO
Olivia Kelman and Joshua Carpenter
K&L Gates
A rule enforced by the state Department of Corrections banned facial hair longer than one-half inch, but that policy conflicted with a Muslim tenet that men should grow beards the length of a fist.
Muslim inmate Durrell Sims asked a federal judge in a pro se filing to allow him to grow a longer beard under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The court asked for help from law firms, and the K&L Gates attorneys took the case to trial pro bono.
It ended up being the first trial for both associates. They had six months to prepare for the two-day bench trial.
U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle concluded the beard requested by Sims "would pose no security, misconduct or flight risk" and "will not compromise the department's compelling interests."
He ordered the department in August to allow Sims to follow his religious beliefs on his beard and mustache and issued an injunction to enforce his order,
Describe a key piece of testimony, evidence, ruling or order in your case and how it influenced the outcome: With minimal physical evidence available, this case hinged almost entirely on the witnesses' testimony, so credibility was of paramount importance.
Carpenter and Kelman focused their client's testimony on the devoutness of his Muslim beliefs, the steps he took to practice his religion while incarcerated and his near-perfect disciplinary record. The court found Sims credible as a sincere Muslim and "near-model inmate" who presented minimal risk to the state.
The court also had to weigh the directly competing testimony of plaintiff's prison security expert, Tim Gravette, against the state's expert, former Assistant Corrections Secretary James Upchurch. Kelman and Carpenter convincingly presented Gravette's testimony that a large majority of prisons already allow fist-length beards with minimal adverse impact and highlighted Gravette's extensive experience safely and effectively searching long beards without incident at the U.S. Bureau of Prisons.
They also used contradictory prior testimony from Upchurch in a similar case to impeach his credibility regarding the state's need for the challenged regulation.
The court ultimately found Gravette to be more credible and credited "Gravette's testimony over the conflicting testimony of the department's witnesses," which turned out to be the key to victory in the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readCOVID-19 Death Suit Against Nursing Home Sent to State Court, 11th Circuit Affirms
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250