Akerman Team Helps Deliver Defense Verdict in Plane Crash Faulting Manufacturer
A Fort Lauderdale jury finds no fault with a fuel system blamed for a midair stall.
December 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
2 minute read
Products liability
MICHAEL MARSH AND DONNIE KING
Akerman
The Akerman team represented French plane maker Daher-Socata and U.S. subsidiary Socata North America along with co-lead counsel Nixon Peabody in a lawsuit blaming a design defect for the crash of a TBM 700/850 that injured the two people aboard.
The single-engine turboprop plane went down at 100 mph at a high school athletic field in Fayetteville, Georgia, in 2014. The plaintiffs sought more than $15 million in damages in Broward Circuit Court, blaming the fuel system for an engine stall while the aircraft was on autopilot.
The defense blamed pilot error by Blaine McCaleb, who was injured along with his wife, Dr. Cynthia McCaleb, arguing the crash could have been avoided if he had flipped a switch. She claimed career-ending brain injuries.
The defense relief on expert testimony and animation. The jury was out for more than a day before delivering a defense verdict in November 2018.
Describe a key piece of testimony, evidence, ruling or order in your case and how it influenced the outcome: Anticipating the jury would have spent almost two weeks digesting conflicting, complicated information about the airplane crash, we strategically saved our piloting expert, William Jeffrey Edwards, as the last witness before closing arguments.
We used sophisticated technology to vividly bring our case and its theme together for the jury. We structured his testimony to sound like a closing argument on pilot error.
Using the data from the integrated flight instrument system and the aircraft audio recordings, experts were able to reconstruct and animate the actual flight. The animation went beyond allowing the jury to see the movement of the aircraft. The jury was also able to see the movement of gauges inside the cockpit and see and hear the 24 alarm bells and warnings that should have notified the pilot that there was a problem.
Using this animation, our last witness took the jury through a simple but very captivating story of the flight and inferior piloting that lead to the crash. We strategically gave ourselves two closings — one before the plaintiff and one after.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 2Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 3Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
- 4Elon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Del. Court
- 5Litigation Funder Behind Mastercard Case Says Settlement 'Struck Without Our Agreement'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250