Foundation or Fraud? That Was Something for a Bankruptcy Judge to Decide
A Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton team led an usually complex effort to prove the former owner of a collapsed bank in Ecuador was hiding assets in a foundation to avoid paying a $600 million judgment.
December 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
2 minute read
BANKRUPTCY
Corali Lopez-Castro
Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton
A Miami businessman from a prominent family that owned Ecuador's fourth largest bank before its failure faced a $600 million Bahamian judgment. But he was accused in his Chapter 7 bankruptcy case of hiding assets in a purported family foundation founded in Panama in 2003 and blocking recovery attempts since then.
Cori Lopez-Castro and her team dug in, literally and figuratively, finding thousands of pages and hundreds of exhibits to prove their case, which she considered the most complex of her career.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Laurel Isicoff presided over a 10-week trial and ruled in July that Leonidas Ortega Trujillo, rather than his children, was the equitable owner of the foundation and the assets of the foundation and related companies should be surrendered.
Describe a key piece of testimony, evidence, ruling or order in your case and how it influenced the outcome: In the adversary proceeding trial of Angueira, Trustee v. Ortega, the issue was whether the debtor was the true beneficiary of a Panamanian foundation and other related entities, in which case these entities' assets would be part of the bankruptcy estate and administered for the benefit of creditors.
While the debtor defended on the grounds that he was not the beneficiary or owner, but instead his children were the beneficiaries and owners, Lopez-Castro and her team successfully introduced critical evidence including the debtor's testimony, complex agreements, tax returns and the conflicting testimony of the debtor's children to establish that the debtor in fact received $2.8 million from the entities between 2010 and 2015.
Lopez-Castro and her team were also able to show that the debtor's children received no benefits from the foundation. Based on this and other evidence, the court entered an extensive memorandum opinion finding that the debtor was the true beneficiary of the foundation and its related entities because he owned and controlled their assets. Her co-counsel at K&L Gates, Michael de Marco and Jeff Kucera, representing the major creditor, were also critical to the victory.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWinston & Strawn Snags Sidley Austin Cross-Border Transactions Partner in Miami
2 minute readMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
- 2Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 3With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 4Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 5Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250