Foundation or Fraud? That Was Something for a Bankruptcy Judge to Decide
A Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton team led an usually complex effort to prove the former owner of a collapsed bank in Ecuador was hiding assets in a foundation to avoid paying a $600 million judgment.
December 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
2 minute read
BANKRUPTCY
Corali Lopez-Castro
Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton
A Miami businessman from a prominent family that owned Ecuador's fourth largest bank before its failure faced a $600 million Bahamian judgment. But he was accused in his Chapter 7 bankruptcy case of hiding assets in a purported family foundation founded in Panama in 2003 and blocking recovery attempts since then.
Cori Lopez-Castro and her team dug in, literally and figuratively, finding thousands of pages and hundreds of exhibits to prove their case, which she considered the most complex of her career.
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Laurel Isicoff presided over a 10-week trial and ruled in July that Leonidas Ortega Trujillo, rather than his children, was the equitable owner of the foundation and the assets of the foundation and related companies should be surrendered.
Describe a key piece of testimony, evidence, ruling or order in your case and how it influenced the outcome: In the adversary proceeding trial of Angueira, Trustee v. Ortega, the issue was whether the debtor was the true beneficiary of a Panamanian foundation and other related entities, in which case these entities' assets would be part of the bankruptcy estate and administered for the benefit of creditors.
While the debtor defended on the grounds that he was not the beneficiary or owner, but instead his children were the beneficiaries and owners, Lopez-Castro and her team successfully introduced critical evidence including the debtor's testimony, complex agreements, tax returns and the conflicting testimony of the debtor's children to establish that the debtor in fact received $2.8 million from the entities between 2010 and 2015.
Lopez-Castro and her team were also able to show that the debtor's children received no benefits from the foundation. Based on this and other evidence, the court entered an extensive memorandum opinion finding that the debtor was the true beneficiary of the foundation and its related entities because he owned and controlled their assets. Her co-counsel at K&L Gates, Michael de Marco and Jeff Kucera, representing the major creditor, were also critical to the victory.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMiami’s Arbitration Week Aims To Cement City’s Status as Dispute Destination
3 minute readBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250