Speedy Class Arbitration Settlement Reached for Jet-Sharing Members
Members of Fort Lauderdale-based JetSmarter claimed the private jet-sharing service unilaterally changed their terms of membership and added new fees.
December 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
CLASS ACTION/MASS TORTS
Mason Pertnoy and Richard Allen
Solowsky & Allen
Gary Mansfield and David Stone
Mansfield, Bronstein & Stone
Members of the Fort Lauderdale-based JetSmarter Inc. private jet-sharing service weren't happy when they say their terms of membership started changing and new fees were added.
Attorneys at Solowsky & Allen in Miami and Mansfield, Bronstein & Stone in Fort Lauderdale served a demand letter on the company and a draft class action complaint on behalf of the company's 12,000-plus members.
JetSmarter agreed to class certification, amended its membership agreement and eliminated a provision barring class actions. Mediation followed a class arbitration filing, and an agreement was reached in March 2019. The settlement attracted an above-average rate of claims.
Members received $3.13 million in cash and $200 million in flight credits and membership extensions. Less than a year passed between the arbitration filing and final judgment.
Describe a key piece of testimony, evidence, ruling or order in your case and how it influenced the outcome: The key to our successful outcome was twofold. A tremendous amount of effort went into collecting emails, advertisements, news articles and class member statements in order to prepare a high-level, detailed complaint, which told a compelling story of defendant's wrongdoing. The research included finding a critical admission from the defendant in an online interview which directly contradicted email solicitations the defendant made to class members in the same time frame. This evidence went to the heart of the allegations of defendant's wrongdoing.
In addition, we developed a novel legal approach to circumventing the defendant's class action prohibition clause in the membership agreement. This led to defendant agreeing to amend its membership agreement to waive the class action prohibition clause and agreeing to certify the prospective class. The parties' agreement saved class members years of litigation, thousands of dollars in litigation fees and costs and ultimately allowed the parties to focus on reaching a commonsense resolution. Collection of critical pieces of evidence in preparation of the complaint coupled with sound and creative legal strategies allowed class members to obtain substantial redress nearly a year after suffering their damages.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250