James Baldinger, Jennifer Yasko, Aaron Weiss and Steven Blickensderfer, Carlton Fields. Courtesy photosHacks and Exports Targeting TracFone Lead to Big US Award Against Traffickers
An extensive investigation in the United Arab Emirates uncovers large-scale U.S. wireless phone traffickers, who lost in litigation.
December 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
3 minute read
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
James Baldinger, Jennifer Yasko, Aaron Weiss and Steven Blickensderfer
Carlton Fields
TracFone Wireless Inc. is the nation's largest prepaid wireless phone company, but its business model was under attack. The concept was to sell specially manufactured phones at discounts and recoup the money on the sale of wireless airtime.
But TracFone realized traffickers were buying and unlocking three-quarters of its phones, cutting out the company by hacking its proprietary software and reselling the devices for a profit overseas.
The company retained Carlton Fields to go on the offensive 15 years ago to stamp out new trafficking outbreaks when they discover them. And they keep turning up new ones.
Describe a key piece of testimony, evidence, ruling or order in the case and your view of how it influenced the outcome.
We filed TracFone Wireless v. Nektova Group et al. after an extensive investigation conducted in the United Arab Emirates and throughout the United States. TracFone led the endeavor as part of its aggressive efforts to pursue traffickers and shut them down to protect its customers and the company. I accompanied TracFone's legal and fraud experts to Dubai to visit handset trafficking warehouses and meet with illicit dealers. The trip was a game-changer. We gleaned information about previously unidentified traffickers in the United States, including the defendants named in the Nektova matter.
The complaint we filed in January 2019 details overwhelming evidence of the defendants' misconduct, including a sworn affidavit from a Dubai businessman who told us the defendants sold him more than 10,000 new TracFone-branded iPhones in a three-month period in 2018. He is not an authorized reseller of TracFone products and understood the phones he purchased were obtained by "runners" who buy up TracFone devices from big-box stores to resell them unlawfully.
The case easily survived a motion to dismiss in April because Carlton Fields has established precedential case law recognizing the viability of handset trafficking claims on behalf of our clients in jurisdictions across the country over the past 15 years.
In September, the court entered a $10 million judgment and a permanent injunction against the defendants. TracFone has filed multiple cases based on our Dubai investigation this year and intends to file more as it works to eradicate illicit trafficking of its handsets.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Second Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read
'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Families Settle Court Battle Over Who Owns Parkland Killer's Name, Likeness
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
