Shook Hardy Partner Leads Defense Win for Breast Cancer Drugmaker
As the first chair trial attorney, Hildy Sastre prevailed in a bellwether trial blaming the chemotherapy drug Taxotere for permanent hair loss.
December 09, 2019 at 06:00 AM
2 minute read
COMPLEX/BUSINESS LITIGATION
Hildy Sastre
Shook, Hardy & Bacon
The administrative managing partner of the law firm's Miami office won a defense verdict in a bellwether trial blaming permanent hair loss on the chemotherapy drug Taxotere.
As first chair defense attorney in the New Orleans federal trial, Hildy Sastre took home a verdict in September for Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC after two hours of deliberations.
It was the first trial in the multidistrict litigation covering 12,000 plaintiffs suing drugmakers over the breast cancer drug. Beyond the federal cases, hundreds more Taxotere cases are pending in New Jersey state courts.
Permanent hair loss was noted as a possible side effect when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration made a labeling change in 2015.
Describe a key piece of testimony, evidence, ruling or order in your case and how it influenced the outcome: I don't think that there was a particular ruling or order that altered the outcome at this trial. Our judge worked tirelessly to make rulings she thought were fair. Did we agree with every ruling? No. But neither did plaintiffs counsel. As I heard from the judge many times, 50% of attorneys are unhappy with her rulings 100% percent of the time.
To me, what made the biggest difference was that we were defending a life-saving chemotherapy drug that has been the backbone of breast cancer treatment for more than 20 years, something no witness could dispute. Chemotherapies are effective drugs, but they come with very real risks, including the risk of persistent hair loss. And when a cancer patient gets multiple chemotherapies, like this plaintiff did, no one can credibly say it was one chemotherapy versus another that prevented hair regrowth.
The jury never got past the first question on the verdict form on specific causation. Even though generally we did not contest that persistent hair loss can happen with Taxotere, the jury was not convinced by the weight of the evidence that other potential causes, including other chemotherapy medications, had been ruled out as the cause.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 2Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 3Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
- 4Elon Musk Has a Lot More Than a 'Tornetta' Appeal to Resolve in Del. Court
- 5Litigation Funder Behind Mastercard Case Says Settlement 'Struck Without Our Agreement'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250