$103 Million Settlement Approved Over FIU Bridge Collapse
"I think this is a textbook example of all the good that can be accomplished in Chapter 11," said Berger Singerman partner Jordi Guso, who represents the contractor that filed for bankruptcy after its bridge collapsed near Florida International University's Sweetwater campus.
December 13, 2019 at 02:34 PM
4 minute read
Victims of the collapse of a 174-foot pedestrian bridge near Florida International University's Sweetwater campus in March 2018 are on course to receive a $103 million settlement after U.S. Bankruptcy Judge A. Jay Cristol approved a reorganization plan for general contractor Magnum Construction Management on Friday.
Formerly known as Munilla Construction Management, the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March. The reorganization plan includes the settlement, which will be distributed in January, provided it survives as anticipated during an appeal window ending Dec. 28.
Six people died and and 10 were injured when 950 tons of concrete and metal collapsed onto a state road, Southwest Eighth Street. It resulted in litigation over alleged design flaws and other errors, which will be resolved under the reorganization plan.
Related story: 'They've All Got to Be Sweating Tacks': Attorneys Discuss Liability Over FIU Bridge Collapse
|
'Not a typical bankruptcy'
Jordi Guso of Berger Singerman in Miami represents debtor MCM and called this a bankruptcy case like no other.
"This is not a typical bankruptcy case where you deal with inventory and equipment," Guso said. "We're dealing with human capital here, unfortunately, because of the loss of life and the injuries that were sustained following the bridge collapse. Clearly, that is a unique and challenging dynamic, one which you don't typically see in commercial bankruptcy cases or restructuring matters."
The plan follows an earlier settlement between MCM and its insurer, which agreed to pay $42 million to victims and their families.
"No matter how much money we could pull together, it never would be enough to fill the hole for someone who's lost a loved one, or who's had a loved one seriously injured by the bridge collapse," Guso said. "That said, I think that this proceeding presents an equitable and efficient resolution of the claims, and hopefully it is a first big step in the healing process."
Guso said the case was particularly tough because of the sheer number of parties involved in negotiations—from MCM's creditors, to plaintiffs who had filed claims, to FIU, its insurer and all other defendants and their insurers.
"One element of the negotiation with one party often had impacts on others, so that was a bit of a challenging dynamic," Guso said.
To Guso, the plan exemplifies the fresh start Chapter 11 aims to provide for troubled companies like MCM, a family business founded more than 35 years ago that once employed more than 1,000 people.
"I think this is a textbook example of all the good that can be accomplished in Chapter 11," Guso said.
Counsel to the creditors Kristopher E. Aungst, partner at Wargo French in Miami, described the plan as a "win all around," noting it wasn't easy to find a resolution that benefited separate groups that were either physically or financially impacted by the accident.
"It was a huge undertaking to get this done," Aungst said. "The committee is extremely gratified that there was a plan worked out that will allow the victims to receive money that's necessary for their lives and their families as soon as possible, and that's also going to have a good return to other creditors in the case, and allow an important business and longstanding family business in Miami to continue to employ people locally."
Retired Florida Supreme Court Justice R. Fred Lewis oversaw an analysis of how the settlement will be distributed, but that information is confidential.
Read the order:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCole, Scott & Kissane Keeps Transitioning More Resources Into Construction As Tort Reform Changes Loom
4 minute readMiami Attorney Secures Major Arbitration Win for Malcolm Drilling in $15M Dispute
$2.3M in Legal Fees Sought After Long South Florida Feud Over $127K
Miami Hospital Deadly Crane Crash Lands in Florida Court
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250