It's Holiday Time—Can the Holiday Party Mean Exposure?
Many employers host holiday parties for their employees. Often conduct at these parties can bring liability upon employers.
December 16, 2019 at 01:29 PM
3 minute read
Many employers host holiday parties for their employees. Often conduct at these parties can bring liability upon employers. Described below are the dos and don'ts to keep employees safe during this time.
Employees, Supervisors and Alcohol—Oh My!
Alcohol makes people (or gives people an excuse) to do or say things they wouldn't otherwise do or say. The issues are limitless and include:
- Intoxicated persons are more likely to make comments/jokes that could insult or be discriminatory or bullying toward a protected group.
- Intoxicated persons may be more touchy with employees leading to inappropriate conduct.
- Intoxicated persons who drive are obvious liabilities.
What Employers Could/Should Do to Control the Situation.
- Unlimited open bars are a thing of the past. Instead, limit alcohol consumption. Provide employees with limited drink tickets. While employees can still collect tickets from others it will reduce consumption overall.
- Have the bar available only a limited amount of time.
- Limit alcohol to wine and beer with lower alcohol content rather than hard liquor or shots.
- Allow the bartender to cut off alcohol consumption.
- Serve food and coffee towards the end of the party.
- Offer taxi or Uber service so employees can get home safely.
- Appoint a number of individuals to monitor the situation and report anyone who is intoxicated to insure that they are cut off, encouraged to eat and drink water and not drive.
Avoid Claims of Sexual Harassment.
Watch for inappropriate behavior by supervisors toward staff (sexual harassment claims arise out of these events).
Tell management not to host the "after party," and the company will not reimburse for the after party.
- Enforce a dress code to avoid dress that the employer believes is inappropriate or unprofessional.
- Avoid activities that put employees in a position that requires physical interaction. It may seem innocuous, but dancing can involve touching. An employee whose supervisor asks them to dance may not believe that they have the ability to say no. Avoid dancing unless employees bring significant others.
- Designate persons to "watch the room" and intervene if they see anyone who looks uncomfortable.
- Hold meetings in advance of the event: supervisors should be reminded not to engage in inappropriate conduct; nonsupervisors should be reminded who they can go to if they find themselves in an uncomfortable position. All employees should be reminded that the employer expects professional conduct during the festivities.
Consider holding the party in the afternoon rather the evening. If held at night, consider hosting the party during the week rather than a weekend. Consider holding the party in the office, while not as festive, employees may tend to act more professionally. Remember that even if the event is strictly social and off premises the employer can still be liable for their employees' actions.
Susan Eisenberg is the Miami managing partner of Cozen O'Connor and represents employers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readLeveraging the Power of Local Chambers of Commerce: A Second-Career Lawyer’s Guide to Building a Thriving Practice
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250