It's Holiday Time—Can the Holiday Party Mean Exposure?
Many employers host holiday parties for their employees. Often conduct at these parties can bring liability upon employers.
December 16, 2019 at 01:29 PM
3 minute read
Many employers host holiday parties for their employees. Often conduct at these parties can bring liability upon employers. Described below are the dos and don'ts to keep employees safe during this time.
Employees, Supervisors and Alcohol—Oh My!
Alcohol makes people (or gives people an excuse) to do or say things they wouldn't otherwise do or say. The issues are limitless and include:
- Intoxicated persons are more likely to make comments/jokes that could insult or be discriminatory or bullying toward a protected group.
- Intoxicated persons may be more touchy with employees leading to inappropriate conduct.
- Intoxicated persons who drive are obvious liabilities.
What Employers Could/Should Do to Control the Situation.
- Unlimited open bars are a thing of the past. Instead, limit alcohol consumption. Provide employees with limited drink tickets. While employees can still collect tickets from others it will reduce consumption overall.
- Have the bar available only a limited amount of time.
- Limit alcohol to wine and beer with lower alcohol content rather than hard liquor or shots.
- Allow the bartender to cut off alcohol consumption.
- Serve food and coffee towards the end of the party.
- Offer taxi or Uber service so employees can get home safely.
- Appoint a number of individuals to monitor the situation and report anyone who is intoxicated to insure that they are cut off, encouraged to eat and drink water and not drive.
Avoid Claims of Sexual Harassment.
Watch for inappropriate behavior by supervisors toward staff (sexual harassment claims arise out of these events).
Tell management not to host the "after party," and the company will not reimburse for the after party.
- Enforce a dress code to avoid dress that the employer believes is inappropriate or unprofessional.
- Avoid activities that put employees in a position that requires physical interaction. It may seem innocuous, but dancing can involve touching. An employee whose supervisor asks them to dance may not believe that they have the ability to say no. Avoid dancing unless employees bring significant others.
- Designate persons to "watch the room" and intervene if they see anyone who looks uncomfortable.
- Hold meetings in advance of the event: supervisors should be reminded not to engage in inappropriate conduct; nonsupervisors should be reminded who they can go to if they find themselves in an uncomfortable position. All employees should be reminded that the employer expects professional conduct during the festivities.
Consider holding the party in the afternoon rather the evening. If held at night, consider hosting the party during the week rather than a weekend. Consider holding the party in the office, while not as festive, employees may tend to act more professionally. Remember that even if the event is strictly social and off premises the employer can still be liable for their employees' actions.
Susan Eisenberg is the Miami managing partner of Cozen O'Connor and represents employers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250