Increased IRS Collection Enforcement—Who Is That Knocking on Your Door?
The IRS intends to reallocate resources to conduct more face-to-face meetings with taxpayers who have ongoing tax issues. This effort stems from the low and limited number of revenue officers available due to the historical constraints and limitations on the resources and budget of the IRS.
December 17, 2019 at 10:07 AM
5 minute read
On Nov. 20, the IRS issued Fact Sheet 2019-15, announcing that "as part of a larger effort by the Internal Revenue Service to ensure fairness in the tax system, the IRS is taking steps to conduct special compliance efforts for individual and business taxpayers in various communities." The IRS intends to reallocate resources to conduct more face-to-face meetings with taxpayers who have ongoing tax issues. This effort stems from the low and limited number of revenue officers available due to the historical constraints and limitations on the resources and budget of the IRS.
In general, during an IRS examination (audit), the taxpayer deals with a revenue agent; whereas once the case is in collections, the taxpayer deals with a revenue officer. Not to pity the IRS but being a revenue officer is truly a thankless job. In addition to dealing with average taxpayers behind on their tax bills, revenue officers deal with tax evaders and fraudsters every single day. Their job requires them to pursue all reasonable avenues to determine the extent of the taxpayers' assets and ability to pay—and one can only imagine the lengths taken by some taxpayers to conceal and frustrate the process. As part of the process, revenue officers routinely conduct in-person, face-to-face interviews of taxpayers, their employers, spouses and anyone who may shed light on the taxpayers' finances. In the context of a business, revenue officers often interview key employees, bookkeepers, accountants and even other businesses with which the business transacts. Ultimately, once a determination is made, the revenue officer works with taxpayers to satisfy their liabilities through full payment or a collection alternative via a payment plan or an offer-in-compromise. If no agreement can be reached, the revenue officer will commence enforcement through liens, levies, garnishment or otherwise. As one can imagine, the revenue officer's job is tedious, frustrating, stressful and extremely time consuming, so the IRS decided to take action.
This new effort by the IRS is aimed to target taxpayers who are aware of an existing tax issue, but who have not resolved the matter with the IRS through correspondence by mail. Furthermore, IRS efforts will increase during specific times, in specific geographical areas where there are a limited number of revenue officers available. Although the IRS did not provide any geographic specifics, it would be safe to assume that South Florida is an area where resources are limited, and increased enforcement may be warranted. With that in mind, here are some things you should know.
Make sure it is really a revenue officer. We are all familiar with the "IRS scams" going around —where individuals on the phone (usually with a thick foreign accent) tell you that you must pay your IRS bill immediately or the police will be summoned to your door. Well, don't put it past the scammers to show up at your door claiming to be from the IRS. In case there is a knock at your door claiming to be the IRS, you have the right to demand two forms of official credentials that include both a serial number and photo of the IRS employee. Also, the visit will not be out of the blue—that is, you would have received at least a few notices by mail before someone shows up at your door. Finally, if any arrangement for payment is made, make sure that the check is made out to the "United States Treasury," and not to any other payee.
You have a right to be represented. You have a right to be represented by an attorney, CPA, enrolled agent, enrolled actuary or other person permitted to practice before the IRS. As such, you may consider either providing the revenue officer with your representative's contact information or requesting the revenue officer's information for your representative to contact the revenue officer directly.
You have a right to record the interview. If you do wish to proceed with the interview at such time, you may be surprised to learn this, but it is your right to audio record the entire interview as long as you make the revenue officer aware that he or she is being recorded. I would certainly advise doing so as it would keep the revenue officer from overstepping, and provide you with admissible proof, should the revenue officer overstep.
You catch more flies with honey. One thing you should always remember is that the revenue officer is there to do his job, and, even if you feel the revenue officer is being unreasonable or overstepping his authority, you should always maintain a calm and respectful decorum; nothing is gained by a hot temper or disrespect. If you see yourself getting angry, ask to end the interview and seek qualified representation.
Datan Dorot is a Florida Bar board certified tax attorney and managing partner of Dorot & Bensimon in Aventura.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDon’t Forget the Owner’s Manual: A Guide to Proving Liability Through Manufacturers’ Warnings and Instructions
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250