Trump Administration Releases Final Opportunity Zone Regulations
"A lot of the changes that we are going to be dealing with are fairly technical things but very sweeping," said attorney David Shapiro, an opportunity zone expert.
December 26, 2019 at 12:29 PM
6 minute read
The Trump administration issued final opportunity zone regulations clarifying uncertainties and eligibility for the tax-break tool, which South Florida developers have called the "cherry on top" for their real estate projects.
Created by federal, bipartisan legislation, opportunity zones aim to breathe life in distressed areas by giving tax deferrals and breaks to investors who put their capital gains toward a business or project in an opportunity zone.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in 2017 created opportunity zones, and the Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service last April issued tentative regulations.
After a comment period and a July 9 public hearing, the Treasury and IRS on Dec. 19 issued 554 pages of final opportunity zone regulations.
"A lot of the changes that we are going to be dealing with are fairly technical things but very sweeping," said attorney David Shapiro, an opportunity zone expert. "Some are clarifications of things that everyone though should be the case but weren't really clear in the rules."
While opportunity zones sound like a simple give and take—an investor puts his capital gains in an opportunity zone in exchange for tax breaks—it's a complex tool with a lot of hurdles investors and developers have to meet for their OZ venture to qualify.
The final regulations make it easier to meet the technical hurdles, said Shapiro, partner at Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr in Philadelphia.
Investors put their money in qualified opportunity zone funds, which can either build new projects in opportunity zones or acquire existing property with plans for substantial improvements. Under the new regulations, investments that come with a 30-month improvement plan qualify even before the renovation has been completed.
"Let's say you acquire a piece of property, and it needs a bunch of improvements. If the cash is going to be spent in the working capital 30-month horizon, then the property counts as good from day one, even if it hasn't met the substantial improvement threshold, as long as you expect to make the substantial improvements in 30 months," Shapiro said. "That's a pretty significant change that's going to make it a lot easier for deals to qualify as good."
Ronald Fieldstone, another Saul Ewing partner and OZ expert, added investors would get the tax break benefit only as long as they follow through with their spending plan.
"You don't do a bogus plan because you want to spend the money. You don't do a plan to spend money to meet your test, if you don't plan to substantially comply with it," said Fieldstone, who is based in Miami. "There's a regulatory checkpoint."
The final rules were good news for investors and developers on another front. The regulations in a way lower the threshold as to what qualifies as an OZ property investment. Previously, it was thought all investments had to be structural, but now it's clear investments in things such as furniture also qualify.
"One big one from a developer perspective is when you are testing whether you are substantially improving a property or building, there was a concern that everything had to be capitalized into the building," Shapiro said. "The new regulations say that anything intrinsic to the function of that specific building can be included. The furniture in the hotel counts as good. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning."
Also, if a portfolio of buildings is purchased in an OZ, but only some of the buildings need improvements because the rest are in good condition, then this still would qualify under the new rules. An investor can aggregate the improvement value across the portfolio for the purposes of qualifying his investment.
The regulations might not necessarily be perfect, but at least they are final, leaving no questions and uncertainties for investors, Fieldstone said.
"From an investor's standpoint, there is much more comfort because you are not guessing. From the developer's point of view it's also better because there's less uncertainty in investing," he said. "The whole industry has been waiting for the regulations to be final."
OZs 101
Under the OZ legislation, investors can defer paying taxes on their capital gains from any venture they sold. A five-year investment means 10% of the capital gains won't be taxed, and a seven-year investment means 15% of the gains won't be taxed, although a Dec. 31 deadline for the latter tax break is looming.
The final date to end a qualified opportunity zone fund is Dec. 31, 2026. This means the deadline to invest for seven years to get a 15% tax break is the end of this year.
Investors separately also can get a tax break on the appreciation of their OZ investments as long as they keep their funds in for 10 years.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in a statement issued last week touted OZs as a boon for communities and added the final regulatory clarifications will prompt more investment.
"Opportunity Zones are helping to revitalize communities and create jobs for hardworking Americans," Mnuchin said. "These regulations provide clarity and certainty for investors, which will enhance the flow of capital to new and expanding businesses, and create sustained economic growth in communities that have been left behind."
South Florida
In South Florida, developers generally can structure OZ investment in different ways. Some have created a qualified opportunity zone fund specifically for their own project and also put in their own capital gains in the fund. Others are betting on investment coming in from others' qualified OZ funds.
In Florida, the state government designated 427 opportunity zones, with 67 of them in Miami-Dade County, 30 in Broward County and 25 in Palm Beach County.
Some of the projects rising in OZs here are a nine-story, floor-to-ceiling glass retail showroom in Miami's Design District, an 18-story Soleste Grand Central apartment tower in Miami's Overtown and Delray Beach's Midtown Delray office and retail project likely to be rechristened to The Village.
But these projects being in OZs didn't dictate developer's decisions to build at these locations. Developers maintain that a real estate deal has to make sense and be lucrative before they even look at whether it's in an OZ and for potential tax breaks.
"If it was a really good deal to begin with, they are going to pursue it, and the opportunity zone will be the cherry on top," said Philip Rosen, a Becker shareholder.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 2PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 3Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
- 4'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
- 5'Careless Execution' of Presidential Pardons Freed Convicted Sex Trafficker, US Judge Laments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250