Litchfield Cavo Plots Growth After First Change at Top
The Chicago-based law firm known for its insurance defense work has Florida offices in Fort Lauderdale and Tampa.
December 30, 2019 at 01:49 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Chicago-based litigation defense firm Litchfield Cavo got its second-ever managing partner since the firm's 1998 founding when Lynnfield, Massachusetts, partner John Jarosak took over for Alan Becker at the start of the new year.
Taking the reins is not unlike taking over an NCAA basketball dynasty, Jarosak said. He compared his succession to Gene Bartow replacing John Wooden at UCLA after Wooden led his team to 10 NCAA championships in 12 years. Bartow took over when Wooden retired in 1975.
"It's very large shoes to fill," Jarosak said. "Al has guided the firm as its managing partner since its inception. We have grown in a measured and very positive sense since I've been with the firm, which is [in] 2002. At that time, we had four offices and around 38 attorneys in total."
Litchfield Cavo now has 275 lawyers spread across 22 offices, and Becker was "instrumental in guiding the firm through that growth period," Jarosak said.
The firm has 30 attorneys in its Florida offices in Fort Lauderdale and Tampa to rank 86th on the DBR's Review 100 list of top law firms in the state by headcount.
Jarosak is hoping the firm will grow under his watch as well. He said he anticipates Litchfield Cavo will expand to 300 lawyers within three to five years by adding people to new practice areas. Litchfield Cavo has largely focused on representing insurance companies.
Earlier this year, the firm successfully represented an insurer that limited the amount a Naples golf course could recover after Hurricane Irma blew through.
"We have started to expand out to other areas of practice," Jarosak said. "I expect that trend to continue [as] we diversify the nature of the practices here at Litchfield Cavo."
Jarosak is optimistic that the firm under his leadership will "increase our footprint across the country," although he demurred when asked if Litchfield Cavo is planning to open new offices.
"We're constantly in discussions with either potential [lateral] partners or sometimes small groups of partners and associates who are in locations that we currently do not have an office," Jarosak said. "There is nothing currently today that is imminent, but as I mentioned we're always looking."
The last half of 2019 saw a number of merger and combination announcements from Litchfield Cavo's Midwest competitors, including Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister, which announced a deal with Minneapolis-based Briggs & Morgan, and Minneapolis-based Faegre Baker Daniels, which is planning a merger with Philadelphia-based Drinker Biddle & Reath.
Jarosak said Litchfield Cavo is under no pressure to scale up.
"We prefer to do it within, so to speak, and grow the firm as it is," he said. "I don't anticipate any type of large-scale merger with another law firm."
2019 also saw a couple of high-profile departures from Litchfield Cavo. In January, two partners in Pennsylvania jumped ship to Freeman Mathis to open an office in Pittsburgh. In June, more than half of Litchfield Cavo's Houston office left to start its own litigation boutique, McKinney Taylor. Principal Andrew McKinney told Texas Lawyer client conflicts were becoming an issue at Litchfield Cavo, and they were worried about the financial costs created by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
Asked about their departures, Jarosak echoed a point made by McKinney: the former Litchfield Cavo lawyers wanted to create their own Texas-centric law firm.
"We respected their decision, and we had a very professional and amicable departing," Jarosak said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute read'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Courts of Appeal Conflicted Over Rule 1.442(c)(3) When Claims for Damages Involve a Husband and Wife
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250