Miami Lawyer Helps Land $5 Million Verdict For Aspiring Rapper Shot Outside Nightclub
North Miami Beach attorney David Charlip and Maitland attorney Ortavia Simon represented a man who was shot outside a nightclub in Sanford, leading jurors to find its security company and former owners liable for negligent security.
December 30, 2019 at 02:36 PM
7 minute read
David Charlip of Charlip Law Group in North Miami Beach teamed with Ortavia Simon of Simon Law Group in Maitland to secure a $5 million jury verdict for a man who was shot seven times after leaving a nightclub, in a parking lot he alleged security staff hadn't properly guarded.
Dezje Williams went to The Barn in Sanford on Aug. 15, 2016, to watch a local rapper and friend perform at a weekly hip-hop night. But the evening took a turn when Williams left the club and headed to his car, parked in a dimly lit overflow parking lot across the road.
Williams was looking for cousins he'd arrived with, according to Charlip, who said his client walked back to the club when he couldn't find them by the car.
"He encountered these two guys coming the other direction and told them to 'be safe.' They passed him and then he didn't see his cousins at the front of the club, so he went back to the car," Charlip said. "As he approached his car, he saw the guy and his companion basically standing behind the doors of their vehicle, which were open, holding guns and shooting at him."
Williams was hit by seven bullets but managed to run back towards the club before collapsing. He underwent several surgeries, suffered broken ribs and a hemothorax, which is a build up of blood between the chest wall and the lungs.
Williams later identified his shooter, Traveus Lemon, in a police lineup. Lemon was sentenced to 10 years in prison.
Williams sued in 2017, claiming that no security guards had been deployed to the overflow parking lot on the night of his attack, even though it had poor lighting and few surveillance cameras. Sanford police officers had handled security at the club until soon before the incident, when the club hired security company Armor Bearer Security & Protection LLC, which the plaintiff alleged was inexperienced.
"Despite the fact they felt it was going to be a full house that evening, the bar management reduced the number of security guards from four to two," Charlip said.
But it didn't help the plaintiff's case that the venue was right around the corner from the Sanford Police Station.
"It's difficult to make a negligent security argument when the police station is literally … you could see it from the nightclub," Charlip said. "We pointed out that the job of security was not the Sanford police's responsibility. It was certainly something the bar owners had paid the Sanford police to do in the past, but they had made a decision not to pay them."
Scott A. Tacktill of The Unger Law Group in Orlando represents The Barn's former operator, now-defunct company Silver Saddle Entertainment Inc., which jurors found 75% liable, and its current landlord JTV Investments LLC, which jurors found was not to blame.
"Unfortunately, it was bad timing, because they normally had four armed security people in the parking area but that particular day they had not expected a big crowd and switched it to two," Tacktill said. "I think that's what the jury locked onto."
Isadore O. Hyde Jr. of the Law Office of Isadore Hyde in Lake Mary represents Armor Bearer, which jurors found 25% liable. She did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
|Random shooting or retaliation?
At trial, both parties disputed events leading up to the shooting. Charlip claimed Williams was familiar with the men but had never spoken to them before.
"We think they were trying to steal something from him because he was the victim of an attempted robbery the week before, and he had some nice jewelry, as some of these rappers tend to do," Charlip said. "That's the only motive that we believe was reasonable."
But defense attorney Tacktill cast doubt on that version of events, pointing to testimony from Lemon, who claimed Williams pulled a gun first. The facts remain in dispute, but Lemon alleged the shooting was in retaliation to the earlier attempted robbery, when his friend Darrius Grooms was allegedly shot.
"This wasn't a random shooting," Tacktill said. "There is a history here."
Williams has denied any wrongdoing, and police found no evidence he had a gun or was involved in starting the incident.
Charlip said he worried about potential prejudice from North Florida jurors against his client, a young, black male with a shaky employment history and tattoos from head to foot. So Charlip made sure Williams had a chance to explain how his injuries have affected him.
"A lot of the tattoos were musically-oriented and an expression of his artistic thoughts and demeanor," Chalrip said. "The fact that he had scars was upsetting to him because it ruined the tattoos and it affected his self image."
Charlip said the attack has shattered his client's aspirations to become a rapper, as he's now self-conscious of scarring on his face and body, and afraid to go to nightclubs and other crowded places.
Jurors awarded Williams $1 million for past and future medical expenses, $1 million in past and future wages and $3 million for pain and suffering.
"I think the jury saw him as being courageous, and someone who should be rewarded for his willingness to work within the system to see that bad guys don't walk the streets," Charlip said.
Tacktill has moved for a directed verdict, arguing that jurors gave $1 million more than the plaintiff had sought for pain and suffering.
"They were giving away money quite a bit," Tacktill said. "It appears that the jury acted more out of sympathy than anything else. I'm not saying there's no value here whatsoever because he was shot, there were wounds and he has facial scarring. But the amount here was clearly excessive."
Tacktill also claims there was no evidence of lost wages, earning capacity or future medical expenses. If he prevails, Williams' $2 million in economic damages could fall as low as $10,000—the amount Williams paid for his medical care.
Seminole Circuit Judge Michael Rudisill has yet to rule on the verdict and will hear the motions Feb. 6.
The plaintiff also faces insurance issues, as Silver Saddle had only obtained a $100,000 policy, instead of the $2 million required by its lease. Likewise, Armor Bearer's insurance excluded assault claims, which Charlip argues "makes the whole policy irrelevant," and plans to bring bad faith claims.
|Read the verdict:
Case: Dezje Williams v. JTV Investment LLC
Case no.: 2017CA002297
Description: Negligent security
Filing date: Oct. 11, 2017
Verdict date: Nov. 15, 2019
Judge: Seminole Circuit Judge Michael Rudisill
Plaintiffs attorneys: David Charlip, Charlip Law Group, North Miami Beach; Ortavia Simon, Simon Law Group, Maitland
Defense attorneys: Scott A. Tacktill, The Unger Law Group, Orlando; Isadore O. Hyde Jr., Law Office of Isadore Hyde, Lake Mary
Verdict amount: $5 million
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They Got All Bent Out of Shape:' Parkland Lawyers Clash With Each Other
Tampa Jury Returns $5.8M Verdict Against Insurer Who Denied Coverage
2 minute readEven the Chief Judge Noted the Cost of This Broward Case
Marriott's $52M Data Breach Settlement Points to Emerging Trend
Trending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250