2020 Outlook: How Technological Advances Are Changing the Legal Landscape
Now we're discussing the effects of "smart" technology and social media. While it has always influenced our profession, technological progress is having a greater impact now than ever before.
December 31, 2019 at 10:28 AM
5 minute read
Technology has unquestionably had an exponential effect on the legal industry. Every year, attorneys discuss how technology has transformed the practice of law. It was not long ago that we discussed the shift from paper to computers. Now we're discussing the effects of "smart" technology and social media. While it has always influenced our profession, technological progress is having a greater impact now than ever before.
Technology has the power to save lives. Driverless vehicles, intelligent robotics in medicine and science and many other technologically advanced products reduce the rate of human error that in turn reduces injuries and lost lives. This is of course a welcomed change, and companies implementing these advancements should be applauded so long as they do so methodically and in a manner that keeps the public's safety the foremost priority. Yet, despite these significant advances, error will unfortunately not completely disappear. Catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death litigation will continue, but, as will be the case in many areas of the law, the frequency and types of cases will change.
Car crashes caused by human distraction or mistake, for example, will give way to incidents where driver-assist "smart" technology fails. As a result, certain car crash cases (which in some instances in Florida come with a rebuttable presumption of negligence) will be replaced by complicated and expensive products liability actions involving seemingly unforeseen questions as to liability and causation. While these changes may seem beyond the horizon, in recent years we've already witnessed car crashes involving driverless technology, some of which have tragically resulted in catastrophic injuries and even fatalities. We've also already seen advancements in robotic equipment affecting medical-related litigation and internet privacy and security issues impacting class actions. Technology is undeniably affecting the litigation landscape, and we therefore must prepare for these changes and adapt our practices of law.
These same technological advancements have also revolutionized how attorneys work, litigate and manage. In recent years, law firms have turned to cloud based software and case management systems and have automated case flow and deadline management. Offices have gone paperless. Law firms have implemented "virtual" meetings with staff and clients. We now can connect anytime, anywhere, from any device, with anyone in the world. We can accomplish nearly any task from any location at any time. We review transcripts on sophisticated computer programs which allow the user to edit and share notes effortlessly with colleagues. Terabytes of data are analyzed, in a matter of minutes, by incredibly advanced e-discovery tools which offer analytics that seemed impossible just a decade ago.
Thus, it comes as no surprise that technology has also altered the course of litigation itself. Smart phones, smart cars, smart watches, smart houses, and smart towns have given us access to an incredible amount of information. Juries now frequently watch surveillance footage of the incidents at issue because of the increased prevalence of cameras. Highly complex injuries, medical procedures and financial damages are explained in courtrooms through computerized illustrations and animations that are phenomenally spectacular and instructive. And, the advent and rampant use of social media has fundamentally changed the jury selection process. We now know incredibly detailed information about our jurors before they even speak one word in the courtroom.
Yet, as we prepare to enter the new year, we need to also recognize the various obstacles and potential dangers technology presents. As we become more familiar with and reliant upon technology, we risk losing certain vital skills. If we too often hide behind computer screens, text messages, animations and PowerPoint presentations, we risk losing the ability to engage and connect with colleagues, jurors, witnesses, judges and most importantly, our clients. Technology can be extremely compelling and informative, but it simply cannot replace the impact of a captivating orator making a persuasive and enthralling argument.
Perhaps most importantly, technological advancement has changed us as attorneys and people. Our clients need us … to consult, navigate, guide, protect, and seek justice. Technology threatens us with information overload. We've become physically addicted to our phones, computers and emails. Our dependence on these devises distracts us from our most important priorities. There is no question that our clients are harmed if we allow technology to increase stress, anxiety and disorder, and that is a real danger.
In 2020, and the years to follow, we as a profession face an increasingly difficult challenge to learn how best to utilize technology, which in so many ways makes us better, without allowing it to distract, overwhelm and undermine us.
Michael Hersh and Kimberly Wald are attorneys at Kelley | Uustal, a Fort Lauderdale law firm focusing on catastrophic injury and wrongful death. Contact Hersh at [email protected] and Wald at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Whistleblower Program: What to Expect Under the Trump Administration
6 minute readTurning the Shock of a January Marital Split Into Effective Strategies for Your Well-Being
5 minute readTrending Issues in Florida Construction Law That Attorneys Need to Be Aware Of
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 128 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
- 2Boosting Litigation and Employee Benefits Practices, Two Am Law 100 Firms Grow in Pittsburgh
- 3EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
- 4Bar Report - Feb. 3
- 5Was $1.3M in 'Incentive' Payments Commission? NJ Justices Weigh Arguments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250