A Sea Change in Paid Family Leave Policy for the US? Only Time Will Tell
In the United States, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), enacted in 1993, entitles eligible employees of covered employers to take up to 12 weeks in a 12-month period of unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons with continuation of group health insurance coverage.
January 02, 2020 at 09:50 AM
3 minute read
In the United States, the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), enacted in 1993, entitles eligible employees of covered employers to take up to 12 weeks in a 12-month period of unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons with continuation of group health insurance coverage. TheFMLA only covers approximately 60% of the workforce due to exemptions for employers with fewer than 50 employees. Leave under FMLA is typically used after the birth of a child or for parents that have newly adopted or received a child in their home for foster care placement. However, FMLA also entitles eligible employees that are suffering from a serious health condition that makes an employee unable to perform the essential functions of his job to take leave and entitles eligible employees to take leave in order to care for a spouse, child or parent with a serious health condition. In other words, it is an important federal protection that provides employees with some peace of mind that their job will remain available if leave must be taken.
There is no federal law that requires private-sector employers to provide paid leave of any kind. For years, paid family leave has been the elusive policy in the United States. In fact, according to data compiled by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the United States is the only country among 41 developed nations that does not mandate any paid leave for new parents.
In response to the lack of action by the federal government, a few states have enacted state-mandated paid leave plans, including California, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Washington, D.C. and most recently Washington state. However, recently, the conversation surrounding paid family leave policies has been reignited based on the actions of Congress. On Dec. 11, 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill authorizing 12 weeks of paid leave to mothers and fathers of newborns, newly adopted children or foster children. While the paid leave policy was included as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which authorizes spending and lays out policy guidelines for the Pentagon, it passed with overwhelming support.
On Dec. 17, 2019, the bill was approved by the Senate. The president signed the bill into law on Dec. 20. This law is the first update to federal family leave policy in a generation and the first federal law in the United States requiring paid leave. The law will provide paid leave to more than 2.1 million Americans through the nation's largest employer, the federal government. Despite the popularity of paid leave among employees, it still remains a relatively uncommon benefit among employers with a Department of Labor employee benefits survey from March 2019 showing that less than one in five workers obtain the benefit of paid leave. With the enactment of the NDAA, the conversation surrounding paid leave is again at the forefront of the political landscape leading into the 2020 election and could mark a historic shift toward broader paid family leave laws.
Stephanie C. Mazzola is a director with Tripp Scott in Fort Lauderdale and focuses her practice in the areas of complex commercial litigation, labor and employment, construction law and appellate law. Contact her at [email protected].
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250