Public Official Objected to His Firing Letter, But Court Found No Defamation
"It's better for the public to know what the public official is thinking without the public official having to worry about whether he's going to get sued later for something that he said," said Fort Lauderdale attorney Michael R. Piper, who defended former Sweetwater Mayor Jose M. Diaz against defamation per se allegations.
January 03, 2020 at 02:34 PM
4 minute read
Can former Florida officials be sued for alleged defamatory statements they made while in office?
No, according to the Third District Court of Appeal, which waded into a lawsuit that asked whether a letter former Sweetwater Mayor Jose M. Diaz wrote while in office could be subject to defamation per se claims.
Fired Parks and Recreation director Luis Quintero sued Diaz in 2015, claiming that his termination letter maliciously and falsely said he had poor judgment and was "incompetent, negligent and inefficient in the performance of [his] duties."
Diaz, who's now Sweetwater's commissioner, denied acting in bad faith.
The lawsuit alleged Diaz knew that the statements in that letter — memorialized in public record — were false when he wrote them. And that, the plaintiff claimed, fell under Florida Statute Section 768.28(9)(a), which waives sovereign immunity for certain torts.
But the Third DCA disagreed, finding it didn't matter what Diaz said or didn't say within the scope of his duties: Florida's doctrine of absolute immunity protected him from legal repercussions.
"As the trial court aptly noted, Quintero's argument overlooks the well-settled fact that the defense of absolute immunity or privilege is a separate and distinct concept from sovereign immunity," the opinion said, drawing heavily from Fourth DCA case law.
Third DCA Judge Monica Gordo wrote the opinion, which drew concurrences from Chief Judge Kevin Emas and Judge Vance E. Salter.
Counsel to the plaintiff Howard Brodsky of Gerald J. Tobin P.A. in Coral Gables did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
|'We want people to serve'
The ruling held "no surprises" for Diaz's attorney, Michael R. Piper of Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke, Piper & Hochman in Fort Lauderdale, who said his client was "always comfortable with the fact that he was doing his job and he was doing it the right way."
Piper said he agreed with the panel's findings that a plaintiff can't waive sovereign immunity for a claim that couldn't be brought against the government in the first place.
"If you could never have sued the mayor for defamation, as in this case, then the waiver of sovereign immunity statute did not then create a cause of action that didn't exist," Piper said.
Though his client has never admitted any wrongdoing, Piper stressed that the idea behind absolute immunity is that public policy should favor open responses from public officials.
"It's better for the public to know what the public official is thinking without the public official having to worry about whether he's going to get sued later for something that he said," Piper said.
In Piper's view, this opinion provided a much-needed acknowledgment of immunity.
"We're seeing in other arenas that privileges are being whittled away at, and may be discouraging people from serving, particularly in the law enforcement arena. I think that this is an important decision in that regard, because we want people to serve," Piper said. "This is just further recognition of the public policy in Florida that that's what we want, and that, every once in a while, something's going to have to give in order to get people to do things that not everybody wants to do."
Read the opinion:
More appeals:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorgan & Morgan Sues Law Firm, Managing Partner for Violating Settlement Over Misleading Ads
3 minute readJudge Gives Green Light to Bal Harbour Developer in Legal Dispute
11th Circuit Rejects Private School's Religious Rights Claim When Stopped From Broadcasting Public Prayer
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Irell & Manella have stepped in to defend Foresight Diagnostics in a pending trade secrets lawsuit. The action, which is sealed, was filed Aug. 29 in California Northern District Court by Richards, Layton & Finger and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eumi K. Lee, is 5:24-cv-06117, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al v. Foresight Diagnostics Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
David A. Robinson, John F. Wood and Brendan H. Connors from Holland & Knight and attorneys from Proskauer Rose have entered appearances for Scientific Drilling International, S. Westley Shedd, Pamela Pierce and other defendants, respectively, in a pending shareholder lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 29 in California Central District Court by Umhofer, Mitchell & King on behalf of Matthew D. Van Steenwyk and Gretchen M. Van Steenwyk-Marsh. The suit accuses the controlling shareholder of Scientific Drilling of self-dealing. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, is 2:24-cv-07401, Matthew D. Van Steenwyk et al v. Kedrin E. Van Steenwyk et al.
Who Got The Work
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete partners Laura A. Balson and Ashley L. Orler have entered appearances for Avfuel Corporation in a pending data breach class action. The case, filed Aug. 30 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Kopelowitz Ostrow PA, centers on a 2024 cyberattack that allegedly exposed the personally identifying and private data of 'potentially billions of individuals.' The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, is 2:24-cv-12274, Clark III v. Avfuel Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Stephanie Lamerce of Duane Morris has entered an appearance for MillerKnoll, the Michigan-based furniture company formerly known as Herman Miller, in a pending website accessibility class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Stein Saks, contends that the defendant's website is inaccessible to screen readers and denies full access to blind and visually-impaired individuals. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak, is 1:24-cv-06106, Hernandez v. Millerknoll, Inc.
Who Got The Work
General Motors has turned to attorney Nancy D. Green of Ricci Tyrrell Johnson & Grey to defend a pending breach-of-warranty lawsuit. The case, for claims under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, was filed Aug. 30 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by the Lemon Law Group Partners on behalf of the purchaser of a new 2022 GMC Sierra 1500 vehicle. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey L. Schmehl, is 5:24-cv-04595, Fey v General Motors LLC.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250