Derivative Actions Under Fla.'s Revised Corporate Statute—New 2020 Rules
In January 2020 the "futility exception" will return. Florida law has long followed the rule that the law will not require a futile act.
January 08, 2020 at 10:01 AM
4 minute read
In January 2020 the "futility exception" will return. Florida law has long followed the rule that the law will not require a futile act. The rule has been applied in a wide variety of circumstances: to excuse a party to a contract from performing conditions precedent, to excuse a party from exhausting his or her administrative remedies, or even to excuse the state from proffering evidence showing that an accused qualifies as a prison releasee reoffender. In each of these situations the futile act is unlikely to resolve the dispute or change its outcome. The rule exists because the law desires a just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of disputes, and not byzantine exercises where form dominates function. The use of the rule in actions which arise in equity is particularly appropriate, and this would include derivative actions—suits in which a shareholder brings a lawsuit on behalf of a corporation for wrongs done to the corporation.
In derivative actions the plaintiff must first demand that the directors of the corporation pursue the claims on the corporation's behalf. That requirement makes sense because the claims belong to the corporation and corporate management is best positioned to protect the corporation's interests. However, the requirement of a pre-suit demand to the corporate board is illogical when the plaintiff seeks, on behalf of the corporation, to pursue claims that arise from illegal or unfair conduct of corporate management itself. In that scenario the corporate hen house is being guarded by foxes in management; foxes who are unlikely to pursue claims based upon their own misdeeds.
As a consequence, Florida law excused a shareholder from demanding that corporate management pursue such claims on behalf of the corporation. However in 1989 Florida passed the Florida Business Corporation Act. Section 67 of the act required a plaintiff to allege that he had demanded that the corporation's board take action regarding the allegations made in the complaint and that the board either ignored the demand or affirmatively refused to take action. The absence of any language excusing the demand on the grounds of futility led some legal commentators to conclude that there was no "futility" exception to the demand requirement. The opinion of those commentators gained weight in 2013 when Florida's Revised Limited Liability Act was passed. In that act the Florida Legislature expressly included a futility exception and so, the argument went, intended for the exception to apply in derivative claims involving limited liability companies but not in claims involving corporations.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250