Avoiding uncharted territory about the role of religion in jury selection, the Florida Supreme Court ruled an objection was not properly preserved.

But Thursday’s decision raises a fresh question of what it takes to preserve an objection when a high-powered group of criminal defense attorneys is told they didn’t do it right. It involves the case of two men and a woman convicted of killing a Miami teenager as revenge for an alleged rape.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]