Miami Lawyer Negotiates $1.25 Million Settlement Over Hit-and-Run Death
Justin Shapiro of Leesfield Scolaro in Miami obtained a $1.25 million presuit settlement, despite major insurance obstacles, when the owner of the vehicle allegedly involved in a hit-and-run crash refused to cooperate. Here's how he did it.
January 13, 2020 at 01:33 PM
5 minute read
Justin B. Shapiro of Leesfield Scolaro in Miami has secured a $1.25 million settlement for the family of an 84-year-old man who was killed in a September 2019 hit-and-run.
Charles Schelmety Sr. was struck while jaywalking at night, on his way home from Gringos Locos, a taco restaurant in Orlando.
His death triggered a flurry of local media interest, but Shapiro's civil case wasn't looking promising. Police identified Jeffrey Jackson as the owner of the vehicle allegedly involved, although Jackson's son, John Jackman, was reportedly the primary user.
Both pleaded the Fifth Amendment—which protects defendants in criminal cases from self-incrimination—and refused to cooperate with their insurer, Central Mutual Insurance Co., even though they had a $1.25 million policy.
Neither has been charged, and police continue to investigate.
Under those circumstances, any recovery attempts from Schelmety's two adult sons Douglas and Charles Schelmety Jr. could have fallen at the first hurdle, thanks to policy language that gives insurance companies the right to deny a claim if the insured does not cooperate.
Central Mutual Insurance had not officially denied the claim, but Shapiro said he saw it as a likely possibility after discussing the case with an agent.
"If they denied coverage, that's like the Achilles' heel," he said. "When coverage is not involved, you can win the case, you can get a judgment. But if insurance isn't going to pay it, that can present a big problem."
But Shapiro did have some advantages.
His client had been a favorite customer at the taco place he'd visited the day of the crash, so the owners were keen to cooperate and supply surveillance footage, which Shapiro said provided a clear view of what happened.
"It's the most gruesome and heart-wrenching video that I've seen involving an auto case," Shapiro said. "This car comes flying in at what appears to be 40 or 50 miles an hour and just takes out the decedent in the case, Charles Schelmety."
But to have a chance at recovering money, Shapiro had to get creative, demanding that the insurance company retain a lawyer for their insured. That way, the Jackmans would have an attorney-client privilege with their attorney, but not the insurance company itself.
"To protect them from criminal prosecution but also allow them to cooperate in the civil matter, so that they don't lose their insurance coverage of $1.25 million, that would be the most prudent thing to do," Shapiro said.
The effect was swift, according to Shapiro, who said plaintiff counsel received a call from an assigned attorney the next day.
"I don't know what happened behind the scenes, but they ended up tendering the money shortly after that," Shapiro said.
Defense attorney John B. Marion IV of Sellars, Marion & Bachi in West Palm Beach did not respond to requests for comment by deadline.
It's not easy to obtain wrongful death verdicts and settlements on behalf of elderly people, according to Shapiro, as they're not typically expected to live more than a few years.
"The cruel but common argument is, 'Well, hey they're not going to live that long anyway,' " Shapiro said.
That said, Schelmety's children had just lost their mother shortly before the crash, and their father had been enjoying good health for his age. The family had also been close-knit, all living within a few miles of one another.
" These cases are so compelling because of the heinous nature of leaving someone for dead that you really have to throw the rules out the door with respect to life expectancies and values of cases like this, when it does involve a hit-and-run," Shapiro said.
In this case, Shapiro said he sent the defense attorney and insurance company a verdict form from his last hit-and-run wrongful death case, which resulted in a $36.9 million verdict with punitive damages.
Shapiro also secured a $100,000 settlement from GEICO, under his client's uninsured motorist coverage.
Though confident his clients would have prevailed in the case based on liability, Shapiro said he felt the presuit settlement was the right decision, considering how much uncertainty there would have been over any potential verdict and the ability to collect it.
Read the settlement agreement:
Case: Charles Schelmety, Jr., individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles Schelmety, Sr., v. Jeffrey Jackman
Description: Negligence
Settlement date: Nov. 19, 2019
Plaintiffs attorney: Justin B. Shapiro, Leesfield Scolaro, Miami
Defense attorney: John B. Marion IV, Sellars, Marion & Bachi, West Palm Beach
Settlement amount: $1.25 million
More verdicts and settlements:
'I Thought I Was Going To Get Killed': South Florida Lawyers Win $4M Against Disney Cruise Line
Miami Lawyer Helps Land $5 Million Verdict For Aspiring Rapper Shot Outside Nightclub
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readAttorneys, Health Care Officials Face Nearly $80M RICO Suit Over Allegedly Fabricated Spreadsheet
Navigating Florida Property Insurance Claims in a Post-Fee-Shifting World
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250