Final IRS Regulations Clarify Lifetime Gift Rules Under the TCJA
Many tax and estate planning professionals have been advising their clients to take advantage of the increased exclusion amount by making lifetime gifts prior to the sunset of the increased credit amount.
January 17, 2020 at 10:38 AM
5 minute read
In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the TCJA) was passed, resulting in significant changes across the board for federal taxes: there were changes to individual income tax rates and available deductions, corporate tax rates were cut, major changes were introduced affecting international taxes, and there were big changes affecting estate and gift taxes as well.
The TCJA resulted in an increase in the credit for estate and gift taxes from $5 million to $10 million, both adjusted for inflation (meaning that the first $10 million transferred by gift or bequest is exempt from taxation and anything in excess is subject to a 40% tax on the net value of the gratuitously transferred asset). For 2020, an individual has a credit amount of $11.58 million, which means that the estate and gift tax has effectively been eliminated for all but a very narrow segment of the population. The increase, however, only lasts through 2025, and in 2026 the estate and gift tax credit reverts back to approximately $5 million.
The estate and gift tax credit is applied to lifetime gifts up to the full credit amount and any balance is applied at death. Another important concept to understand is that "portability" is available for the unused portion of a decedent's exclusion amount, which may be transferred to the surviving spouse (exclusively).
Many tax and estate planning professionals have been advising their clients to take advantage of the increased exclusion amount by making lifetime gifts prior to the sunset of the increased credit amount. The future of the exclusion amount depends on who is in political office, and in a client's lifetime we cannot predict in which direction the exclusion amount will head, notwithstanding the scheduled sunset of the increased amount in 2026.
With the uncertainty of the future of the exclusion amount, what is the best way to use a guaranteed $11.58 million exclusion amount that is known and available today? For those who are in good health, who would not be expected to die prior to the reversion to the $5 million exclusion amount in 2026, using the exclusion amount as a credit for lifetime gifts is a good way to hedge against an exclusion amount that could be drastically lowered on a future date of death.
When the TCJA was first passed, it was unclear whether lifetime gifts made using the increased exclusion amount would ultimately be taxed at death to the extent the exclusion amount decreased after 2025. To clarify this matter, on Nov. 23, 2018, the IRS issued proposed regulations with rules that would prevent the inappropriate taxation of lifetime gifts made using the increased exclusion amount. Proposed regulations, although a good indication of the outcome intended by the government, are not final law, which is why it was a great relief when final regulations were published in November 2019. The final regulations adopted the proposed regulations, confirming that the higher of the exclusion amount used to offset lifetime gifts or the exclusion amount available at death will be applied, and provided examples of how the rules affecting lifetime gifts using the increased credit amount would be treated.
For example, assuming no prior gifts, if an individual makes an $11 million gift in 2020 and dies in 2027 with a gross estate of $8 million, assuming the exclusion amount has been decreased to approximately $5 million, the individual will have no remaining exclusion amount to offset the estate taxes and will be taxed on the full value of the estate, but the individual will have made use of an $11 million exclusion amount during the individual's lifetime and will not be retroactively subject to taxation on the lifetime gifts made in excess of the credit amount on the date of death.
Additionally, if a spouse dies with, for instance, a gross estate of $2 million in 2020 and makes a portability election to transfer the remaining $9.58 million 2020 exclusion amount to the surviving spouse, the surviving spouse will be credited for the entire transferred amount, which will be added to the exclusion amount available on the date of the surviving spouse's death. This is a tremendous benefit, as it enables the surviving spouse to grandfather in the deceased spouse's exemption regardless of any change in the law.
In a published statement, and as evidenced by the final regulations, the IRS has made it clear that "individuals taking advantage of the increased gift and estate tax exclusion amounts in effect from 2018 to 2025 will not be adversely impacted after 2025 when the exclusion amount is scheduled to drop to pre-2018 levels." Although 2026 seems far away, it is never too early to start considering one's options and planning. Fortunately, the much-needed clarification under the regulations provides more clarity to facilitate planning.
Elysa Merlin is a tax associate with Dorot & Bensimon in Aventura. She focuses primarily on international and domestic wealth planning.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNavigating Claims Under the Florida Telephone Solicitation Act and Florida Telemarketing Act
4 minute readSecond Circuit Ruling Expands VPPA Scope: What Organizations Need to Know
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250