Genetic Information Bill Gets Quick House Committee Backing
Florida would become the first state to have a law preventing insurers from using genetic information in making policy decisions if incoming House Speaker Chris Sprowls' proposal is ultimately passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor.
January 17, 2020 at 12:14 PM
5 minute read
Incoming House Speaker Chris Sprowls had little trouble convincing members of a House health-care panel to approve legislation that would prohibit life-insurance, long-term care insurance and disability-insurance companies from using customers' genetic information in changing, denying or canceling policies.
Florida would become the first state to have such a law if Sprowls' proposal is ultimately passed by the Legislature and signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Members of the House Health & Human Services Committee passed Sprowls' bill (HB 1189) without any debate, and committee Chairman Ray Rodrigues, R-Estero, praised Sprowls for introducing the bill.
"I think our privacy is important. And I think it's equally important to be a visionary, to look forward and I'm happy that Florida is going to be the state that leads the way on this issue," Rodrigues said.
Insurance industry lobbyists, who opposed the measure, sat quietly, agreeing to waive their speaking time.
Curt Leonard, regional vice president for state relations for the American Council of Life Insurers, said his association had expressed concerns on the issue for the past two years.
"We've expressed our concerns with Speaker Sprowls and other interested parties on this issue going back to 2018. So there's no point in repeating the same things over and over again, in the interest of the committee's time," Leonard said. "That being said, we do share the speaker-designate's [Sprowls'] concerns about privacy. I think it's a concern for everybody."
The bill will have to clear the Commerce Committee before it would be ready to go to the full House. Sprowls, R-Palm Harbor, is slated to become speaker after the November elections.
Hours before the committee considered the bill, supporters launched a website dubbed Protecting Our DNA and a Facebook page.
The website also includes a petition and animated digital video helping to explain the issue.
Sprowls told reporters after the meeting that the social media campaign was launched to educate the public.
"I think most people, myself included up until a couple years ago, [weren't] aware that if you had gotten a genetic test, that was something that your insurance company could get. I think when you tell people who've said they have 23andMe or who have had a genetic test in a clinical setting, whatever the reason, they had no idea that they have this massive liability by giving it to their insurance companies," he said. "So it's part about raising the awareness for people that it's a danger and that this bill will help close the loophole and garner support. We want them to know about the bill. We want them to be educated on the topic."
In addition to preventing insurers from using the information in making policy decisions, Sprowls' bill also would block the companies from requiring or soliciting genetic information from applicants.
Sprowls said insurance companies have for years been able to sell policies without having access to the genetic data.
Insurance carriers "have been successful without access to genetic information. They have been able to provide affordable coverage to consumers without genetic information. Insurance is about spreading risk, not guaranteeing the outcomes or rewards to the (carriers). And affordable life, disability, and health insurance should not be available simply to the genetic elite," Sprowls said.
Florida Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, who helps oversee the insurance industry, also backs efforts to pass legislation. In a statement issued after the vote, Patronis, said "As DNA testing becomes more popular through companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA, we must ensure that your genetic code is not used against you."
Federal law already prevents health insurers from using genetic information in underwriting policies and in setting premiums. But the prohibition doesn't apply to life insurance or long-term care coverage, which Sprowls described as a "massive loophole."
Florida isn't the only state to look at the issue. California, New Jersey, and New York require insurers to get informed consent when requesting genetic testing for life or disability insurance, according to a Florida legislative staff analysis.
Also, Massachusetts prohibits unfair discrimination on the basis of genetic information or tests and prevents requiring applicants or existing policyholders to undergo genetic testing. In Arizona, life and disability insurance carriers are prohibited from using genetic information for underwriting or ratemaking unless supported by an applicant's medical condition, medical history and either claims experience or actuarial projections.
It's unusual for incoming House speakers and Senate presidents to file bills under their names. But Sprowls, a cancer survivor, said it's an "honor" to do so.
While Sprowls' influence looms large in the House, he must convince the Florida Senate to go along. For that, Sprowls said he will look to Sen. Kelli Stargel, R-Lakeland, to spearhead the issue.
"I leave the Senate in her capable hands," Sprowls said.
Senate President Bill Galvano, though, told The News Service of Florida that he supports a potential compromise on the issue.
Leonard said a compromise would authorize consumers to "use their private information any way they want to. And that might include them wanting to share their genetic science or genetic testing information," he said. "So we don't like the idea that consumers will be handcuffed in how they use that information."
Christine Sexton reports for the News Service of Florida.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFla.'s Statute of Limitations and Statutes of Repose in Med Mal Cases: It's Not Over Until It's Over
6 minute readGC of Florida State Agency Steps Down After Threatening TV Stations That Aired Abortion-Rights Ad
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250