Miami Beach Hotel-Condo Owner Wins Long Battle With Former Owner, Co-Developer
A Miami-Dade circuit judge sides with New York investor Louis Taic, who claimed he was induced to buy into a financially ailing South Beach venture with a misleading balance sheet.
January 22, 2020 at 11:47 AM
6 minute read
A bitter seven-year legal battle between the family that co-developed Miami Beach's Z Ocean Hotel and an investor who arrived after the project was finished and in financial straits ended in favor of the investor.
South Beach Resort Development LLC completed the 80-unit Z Ocean hotel-condominium at 14th Street and Collins Avenue in 2006. Units are individually owned but subject to short-term stays by owners who rent them in a building designated for transient rather than residential use. Owners can rent units on their own or through the onsite Crowne Plaza South Beach.
The litigation focused on whether the seller of South Beach Resort Development misrepresented company financial reports to induce the investor to buy a two-thirds stake.
Miami-Dade Circuit Judge William Thomas found fraudulent inducement in the sale and sided with the investor on other claims against and by the co-developers.
Before the investor bought into South Beach Resort Development, he was given an inaccurate balance sheet that made it seem like the condo-hotel was profitable. The co-developers vouched for the accuracy and truthfulness of the balance sheet.
"The truth, however, as revealed only after the filing of the 2007 tax return in 2009, was that South Beach Resort Development was a terribly struggling company on the verge of insolvency, with negative equity," Thomas concluded.
He issued his findings of fact and conclusions of law Jan. 13 after a four-day bench trial last October. A damages award is pending.
An attorney for the winning side saw this as justice finally served.
"This was a hard-fought complicated case," said Richard Sarafan of Genovese Joblove & Battista in Miami. The judge "found my clients were clearly the victims of fraud, and this ruling does substantial justice between the parties."
Sarafan worked on the case with Genovese Joblove attorney Michael Bild.
The attorney for the losing side said an appeal is being considered.
"While we have great respect for Judge Thomas, we believe in this instance he misapplied the controlling law and also ruled inconsistent with the uncontroverted evidence presented at trial," said Abbey Kaplan, founding member of Kluger, Kaplan, Silverman, Katzen & Levine in Miami.
What Happened?
When South Beach Resort Development formed in the early 2000s to develop the project, it was led by Ronald Molko, who owned half of the limited liability company, and the Grabarnick family, who divvied up the other half. The Grabarnicks are Philip Gene Grabarnick, wife Pauline Grabarnick and son Garett Grabarnick.
By 2008, South Beach Resort Development was behind on a loan, owing $17 million, prompting it to look for investors, according to Thomas' findings.
Negotiations ensued with buyer and investor So. Beach Hotel LLC, managed by New York investor Louis Taic. Its accountants found poor record keeping by South Beach Resort Development, Thomas wrote.
Gene Grabarnick came up with the solution after investor's accountants found missing records of putting together a balance sheet outlining Z Ocean finances and personally guaranteed the document's accuracy. It showed nearly $31.4 million in assets.
So. Beach Hotel bought two-thirds of South Beach Resort Development and hotel manager De Soleil Management LLC in 2008 and became managing member.
But the 2007 tax return for South Beach Resort Development filed in 2009 showed a much different financial picture than the balance sheet.
Among the discrepancies: Total assets were listed as $12.3 million, equity was a negative $7.2 million versus the balance sheet listing of nearly $11 million and liabilities were underestimated by $400,000, Thomas concluded.
The balance sheet also wrongfully listed two accounts receivable due to South Beach Resort Development totaling $3.14 million, but these funds weren't real assets, Thomas added.
The issues came down to the accuracy of the balance sheet and whether the Grabarnicks knew about discrepancies, the judge found. He concluded the buyer relied on South Beach Resort's misrepresentations.
"Such reliance was expected and intended. Gene Grabarnick proposed attaching the balance sheet to the Grabarnick agreement for that very purpose, knowing" that the deal wouldn't close otherwise, Thomas wrote. "Additionally, the Grabarnick agreement expressly confirms that the representations were being made by the Grabarnicks 'as a material inducement to buyer."
Kaplan took issue with the conclusion of fraud in the inducement by Pauline and Garett Grabarnick because neither had any contact with the buyer before the deal closed.
"There was absolutely no evidence whatsoever that either one of them made any statement to the plaintiff that could be considered a misrepresentation … that took place prior to the execution of the contract, no evidence whatsoever," Kaplan said. Pauline Grabarnick "wasn't even present at the closing. Her signature was on the contract, but before that no contact at all. No statements to the plaintiff. The same thing for the son, Garett Grabarnick."
|Other Issues
Thomas sided with Taic's company on other issues as well.
One was over the legitimacy of two promissory notes totaling $500,000 made to GG Investment Realty Inc., a now-defunct company affiliated with Garett Grabarnick. So. Beach Hotel arranged to have South Beach Resort Development and De Soleil Management issue the notes as part of the acquisition with repayment to come from available cash flow.
GG Investment initiated the litigation in 2012 against South Beach Resort Development and De Soleil Management seeking payment of the notes.
Thomas concluded the promissory notes were tainted by fraud and GG Investment failed to show there was cash flow available for payment.
Another question was whether the new majority stakeholder could make capital calls from the other South Beach Resort Development members, namely the Grabarnicks. It issued 11 capital calls for over $2 million, but the Grabarnicks argued So. Beach Hotel must seek other sources first. Meanwhile, So. Beach Hotel paid the Grabarnicks' share as a loan, according to Thomas.
"It is undisputed that the Grabarnicks paid nothing towards these capital calls nor the loans, thereby breaching the amended operating agreement," Thomas wrote.
Thomas also upheld So. Beach Hotel's sale of the Grabarnicks' interest with a $100,000 credit bid in 2013. The Grabarnicks claimed the sale was invalid and commercially unreasonable.
"At the time of the sale, South Beach Resort Development's outstanding liabilities far outstripped the value of its assets," Thomas said. "In other words, the Grabarnicks' minority membership interest in an underwater company in foreclosure was essentially worthless at the time of sale."
South Beach Resort Development owns the 13 unsold Z Ocean Hotel units, the ground-floor retail and garage and manages the hotel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
3 minute readHow Much Coverage Do You Really Have? Valuation and Loss Settlement Provisions in Commercial Property Policies
10 minute readThe Importance of 'Speaking Up' Regarding Lease Renewal Deadlines for Commercial Tenants and Landlords
6 minute readMeet the Attorneys—and Little Known Law—Behind $20M Miami Dispute
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250