South Florida Attorney Wins $2M for Ex-MLB Player From Merrill Lynch
Schwed Kahle & Kress partner Lloyd R. Schwed of Palm Beach Gardens represents retired outfielder Angel Pagan and his wife on their investment claim.
January 23, 2020 at 10:39 AM
4 minute read
Ex-Major League Baseball outfielder Angel Pagan and his wife were awarded more than $2 million after their Merrill Lynch adviser invested the couple's money in unsuitable Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end bond funds before its debt crisis.
A three-member panel decided Merrill was liable for $1.7 million in compensatory damages, 4.5% interest since June 20, 2017, $88,758 in costs and $750 for the the nonrefundable portion of the filing fee.
The Pagans were "thrilled with the decision — the largest award against Merrill Lynch Puerto Rico to date — because the arbitrators awarded virtually all of their losses," their attorney, Schwed Kahle & Kress partner Lloyd R. Schwed, said by email Wednesday. "They trusted Merrill Lynch and their close financial adviser, so this award has restored their trust in the system."
Merrill provided a brief statement Wednesday, saying only it was "disappointed with the panel's decision."
The Pagans asked the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority panel in San Juan for $6 million in punitive damages, but the request was rejected.
"FINRA arbitrators award punitive damages in less than 5% of the cases that go to final award, so the absence of punitive damages did not surprise us," Schwed said. "But the arbitrators clearly wanted to send a message to Merrill Lynch by awarding virtually all of the Pagans' net losses."
Schwed said he reduced the amount of money in punitive damages being sought to $500,000 in his closing before the panel.
The full award will end up totaling $2.1 million after combining damages, an estimated 201,231 in interest plus costs and fee. He noted the Pagans' net loss was $2.05 million.
Pagan, 38, spent five seasons with the San Francisco Giants, four with the New York Mets and two with the Chicago Cubs before retiring in 2016. His final year salary was $10 million.
Pagan and his wife Windy accused Merrill of breach of fiduciary duty; gross negligence and breach of the duty of due care; breach of contract and the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; violations of Puerto Rico and state securities laws; common law fraud and deceit; failure to supervise; control person liability; respondeat superior; and violation of FINRA and securities industry rules and standards of conduct, according to the FINRA panel award statement released Tuesday.
The Pagans requested compensatory damages in excess of $2 million plus the income that would have been generated "if the money had been properly invested," according to the award statement.
The Merrill representative who served as the Pagans adviser, Alex Gierbolini, was not a party in the dispute but was named in the award statement.
In addition to requesting the claim be denied with prejudice and costs be assessed against the Pagans, the firm asked that all references to the arbitration be expunged from Gierbolini's records. All those requests were denied.
Gierbolini has worked at Merrill since 2012, according to his profile at FINRA's BrokerCheck website. The profile lists 24 disclosures, all of them customer disputes. The first one was closed with no action, there were 17 settlements, and the remaining six were still pending.
Schwed claimed Gierbolini continued investing in large amounts of Puerto Rican bonds on behalf of the Pagans knowing they were "junk," according to a transcript of Schwed's closing statements.
Merrill is hardly the first firm to run into trouble with the collapse of Puerto Rico bonds.
A regulatory panel last year said Morgan Stanley must pay Puerto Rican bond investors $3.3 million. Also last year, UBS, Gierbolini's previous employer, was ordered to pay $5 million to investors over issues tied to Puerto Rican Bonds and closed-end funds. A nearly $8 million arbitration award was ordered in May.
Last March, Jose Ramirez, an ex-UBS adviser was sentenced to a year in prison for taking $1 million from investors in Puerto Rico through a fraudulent scheme involving the use of credit lines to buy closed-end bond funds.
Read the decision:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrazil Is Quickly Becoming a Vital LatAm Market for Greenberg Traurig, Other US Law Firms
5 minute read'Would've Been Snoring Without Ya': Fort Lauderdale Jury Awards $4.5 Million in Condo Investment Spat
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Davis Polk Lands Spirit Chapter 11 Amid Bankruptcy Resurgence
- 2Construction Fall Nets $2.3 Million Settlement After Trial Begins
- 3By the Numbers: The 2024 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey
- 4Can The Threat of a Bar Complaint Be a Settlement Tool?
- 5Sentencing Commission Addresses Inconsistent Definitions of “Loss”
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250